&

Lasix price

If so, do the levels of Delta lasix price 8 THC in the products match what’s advertised?. What do you know about the company that’s testing their products?. Be sure you’re buying your Delta 8 THC online from a company that uses independent third-party testing labs. Of course, not all labs are made the same, so consider researching the history of lasix price the testing lab itself if you want to be extra cautious. One more note.

Keep in mind that hemp-derived Delta 8 products are not yet legally available in every U.S. State, so lasix price check your state laws before attempting to purchase. How We Decided Where to Buy the Best Delta 8 Products Online Source of Hemp The source of your hemp is perhaps the most important factor in its quality. Some places where it can be grown, processed, manufactured simply do not match the standards of others. The varying level of regulations leaves a lot of room for some hemp-derived products to blur the lines of what might be acceptable for you as a lasix price consumer.

Understanding the regulations for the hemp market for your Delta 8 THC products will help you better assess if a company’s products are right for you. That’s why we consider the source of the hemp to be so important in determining which Delta 8 THC products to buy. Lab Testing and lasix price Results Not all testing labs are created equally. Make sure to not only check the results of the tests but also where the results are originating. If the lab in question is a questionable lab with a history of neglecting its duties, then find a company that tests among the best.

A trustworthy lab won’t let shoddy products onto the marketplace, and a clear knowledge of a product’s results can tell you more than any lasix price marketing team. Website User Experience You click the link, you load the website. Sometimes, it doesn’t always work though. A clunky website full of information you don’t need—and didn’t ask for—shows lasix price that a company cares more about itself than you. It's recommended that you work with websites that work well with you.

A quick load time, easy-to-read buttons, and an appealing store with functional widgets that make your shopping experience a breeze is one of the most important things we look for when determining the best places to shop for Delta 8 THC online. Payment Options Despite all of the banking regulations that make it difficult for cannabis and hemp-derived products to thrive, the best places to shop for Delta 8 THC offer an array of payment options lasix price that make your life easier. Shipping and Returns If anything eases consumer fears while building customer relationships, it's the shipping and returns policy. Free shipping is always nice. If it’s not offered by a company in the lasix price 2020s, it seems a bit strange.

But if a company is going to charge you for shipping, no one likes a company that hides that fact until the last moment before you click ‘complete order’. Honesty and integrity are important here, so we like to find companies that either offer free shipping or let you know upfront about shipping costs and what to expect. It’s not just the cost of lasix price the shipping that’s important. There are two more key elements in selecting a high-quality place to purchase Delta 8 THC online. Speed of delivery and discretion.

If your Delta 8 THC products arrive in flamboyant packages announcing what they are, it may defeat the purpose of having it being discreetly delivered lasix price. Moreover, the timeframe in which it's delivered is a factor that impacts your health. That’s why when reviewing where to buy Delta 8 THC online, we take shipping seriously. But what if the shipping is better than lasix price expected, but the product is worse?. That’s when it’s time to look at a company’s return policy.

No return policy in place?. That’s lasix price a clear red flag. Easy, free returns on products?. Now that’s a company that believes in what it offers, and that’s why we think they’re a good place to buy your Delta 8 products online. Type of Extraction Not everyone is going to care lasix price about what type of extraction method a company is using, but some may find it vital.

That’s because the extraction method not only leaves behind a carbon footprint, but it may leave something behind in the final product, as well. Some extractions use potentially hazardous compounds such as butane or propane to remove the cannabinoids from the plant material. While the manufacturers and processors claim lasix price that the harmful compounds are completely flushed out of the final product, the extra-cautious may be more likely to seek out a product that doesn’t involve the use of a hydrocarbon. Supercritical CO2 extractions are just one example of an extraction method that may offer a cleaner product. Is the company that’s selling Delta 8 THC online clear about their extraction and processing methods?.

It can be a bit technical, but if a lasix price company offers this info, we consider it evidence of their effort to please their customers. Potency Not all Delta 8 THC products that you can buy online are created equally. The potency of the products you’re looking at varies wildly. Some fast-acting products will deliver the same amount of lasix price Delta 8 THC in a few seconds that a longer-lasting product may deliver over a handful of hours. We know that consumers of hemp-derived products that want to consume Delta 8 THC are looking for a range of options.

That’s why we consider it good form for a company to offer low-dose options for beginners and those with low tolerances. On the other hand, we also like to see an offering lasix price to people with a higher tolerance to cannabinoids. High dosage products that deliver all day long are integral to this demographic’s satisfaction. Taste Many Delta 8 THC products on the market today are scrumptious little treats that are hard to distinguish from popular candies in taste. Others taste like the manufacturer ripped the hemp roots out of the ground and stuffed them lasix price in your mouth.

It’s the nature of hemp-derived products to taste like earth, but some companies try their best to give your tastebuds a bit of relief. For some consumers, of course, the earthy flavor is preferable, which is why most companies offer some type of “unflavored” varieties of Delta 8 products. If we see that the company makes an all-natural flavored version lasix price of their otherwise fruity and dessert-like range of flavors, we know they understand the market and their customers. Quantities Available Much like the taste, potency and extraction methods, customers want a range of quantities. Some customers will be first-timers wanting just small samples of products.

Other long-timers know lasix price what they want and want it in bulk. The best Delta 8 THC companies selling their products online offer a quantity size for every customer. From tiny, one-time goods, to long-lasting jars of Delta 8 THC products, we think consumers should have choices. Ingredients Besides the Delta 8 THC, what exactly are you getting in lasix price your products?. If you can’t answer that question, that company from which you’re purchasing should.

A clear label indicating precisely what you’re consuming is essential. Without this information, a company will never make this list of best places to buy lasix price Delta 8 online. Brand Reputation Brand reputation is highly important, but it’s not everything. That’s because this industry is still new and you wouldn’t want to necessarily overlook a new player in the game just because you haven’t heard of them. However, if a longtime reputation of lasix price quality products and service is your thing, you’ll find those companies on this list.

If they’ve helped other people buy Delta 8 THC online for a long time, we think they can help you, too. Customer Service A quality website and attractive products with affordable prices may induce a purchase, but what happens when you have a question for that company or when a shipment goes missing?. Can you get a hold of customer lasix price service?. Do they offer more than one way to get in contact with their company?. If you’re considering beginning a Delta 8 THC regimen of any kind and want to build a relationship with a company or two, consider getting to know their customer service centers first.

The information you glean from lasix price an experience with them says a lot about their management and how they treat their customers. That’s why we’ve looked at customer service as a point of concern when considering the best places to buy Delta 8 THC online. Transparency Encompassing much of what we’ve discussed, we want to know this information without having to spend hours searching for it. Some companies lasix price that sell D8 online provide additional information below the fold of their website, others have dedicated FAQ pages. However, a certain level of transparency about the products and business practices in question is an important part of determining where we would recommend that consumers buy their Delta 8 THC products online.

Do they give back?. Do they donate to lasix price charity?. Do they run an informative blog?. Do they offer you rewards or discounts?. These kinds of acts aren’t entirely necessary, lasix price but they are a quality bonus that any Delta 8 THC company could offer.

Using these 14 points of consideration, here’s a list of our top 3 places to buy Delta 8 THC products online. Our 3 Favorite Places to Buy Delta 8 Products Online 1. Everest The website lasix price couldn’t look better. It’s clean above the fold and draws the eye to a lovely view of sunlight beaming out from Mount Everest. Click on any of their products and you’ll immediately see a list of ingredients with a link to their test results.

Of course, lasix price the results are clean, honest, and show that you’re getting a good deal for the price of these sustainably sourced cannabinoids. If you decide you don’t like their products, that’s no problem. While they try to process and ship your order within 1 to 2 business days, you can easily cancel it before it ships out if you like, or you can send it back to receive a full refund on the purchase price. They make it easy to understand their shipping and return policy, so the commitment for their lasix price products is relatively minimal. 2.

Burman’s Health Store Whether you want to shop in-store, online, or by phone, Burman’s Health Store leans into their customer service. They offer lasix price contact services through their brick-and-mortar location, a phone call, and even a text message. They also offer a long-time running blog and a podcast, as well. They offer advice, answer questions, and dive into topics related to hemp-derived topics. They seem to honestly know their business lasix price and want to help people interested in things like Delta 8.

What their website lacks in clarity and brevity, they make up for with a generous range of Delta 8 products to select from at all price ranges. Their bundle packages offer interesting choices that make it easy to get a bit of everything. 3. Direct Delta 8 At the time of writing this, on the top of their website, they brightly display a banner that indicates a Prime Day discount for 25% off every order. That’s a solid start for the economic consumer wanting a decent discount.

If you scroll down and wait a while on their page, you’ll be greeted with an offer for free shipping on all orders over $100. It’s clear that Direct Delta 8 wants its customers to save money over the long run. They have very affordable cartridges, flower, edibles, and distillates. We like this company for people who truly want to save money without really sacrificing on quality. What is Delta 8 THC and How Can it Help People?.

One of the lesser-discussed impacts of hypertension medications on the human population has been the dramatic increase in reports of reduced mental wellness. In fact, the World Health Organization says that the novel hypertension’ “main psychological impact to date is elevated rates of stress or anxiety.” Unfortunately, mental wellness can often be even more difficult to treat than physical symptoms and can last indefinitely. So it comes as no surprise that people are often looking for ways to improve their own mental well-being. As a result, for those who are inclined towards hemp-derived products, it’s not uncommon to encounter a compound they may vaguely recognize but not yet fully understand. That compound is delta-8-Tetrahydrocannabinol.

For reader ease, we’ll continue to refer to it as Delta 8 THC, or D8. According to research, Delta 8 is an analog of the better-known delta-9-THC. Much like its more famous counterpart, it also binds to the CB1 receptors located throughout the body within the endocannabinoid system. Though it has a decreased ability to induce psychotropic effects, Delta 8 has been shown to regulate potassium channels, increase protein kinase reactions, and inhibit adenylyl cyclase. But what does that mean for the everyday consumer?.

How Does Delta 8 THC Work in the Body?. While most people are aware that cannabis plants are full of useful compounds, they’re often more familiar with CBD and THC. If you’re at all familiar with how those chemicals work, then it won’t be difficult to understand the relationship your body has with Delta 8 THC. CBD and THC are both cannabinoids that interact with your body’s central nervous system or CNS. More specifically, they target receptors in your body that make up your endocannabinoid system or ECS.

The ECS has two main receptor nodes known as CB1 and CB2 receptors, respectively. Under normal circumstances, your body will produce two endocannabinoids, 2-ag and anandamide. These are endogenous equivalents of CBD and THC. That’s why our bodies freely accept phytocannabinoids when consumed. Delta 8 THC simply takes advantage of this pathway and binds to the CB1 receptors located throughout the body.

How to Properly Dose Delta 8 THC It's widely known that not only does the human body react with cannabinoids, it can also grow a tolerance to the consumption of these products. This may have you wondering how to properly dose your Delta 8 THC. When thinking about how to dose, it's important to realize that every human is unique in how they interact with hemp-derived products, including when they consume Delta 8. How one person doses their Delta 8 may look entirely different than how you dose yours. So, where do you start when you’re considering Delta 8 THC?.

You start with as little as possible. What you want to know before you begin any Delta 8 THC regimen is what your base level of tolerance is. There’s no reason to consume far too much, knowing it will likely have the desired effect. Instead, consume as little as possible to see how little you truly need in order to benefit from consumption. Once you’re familiar with your base level of tolerance, you’ll be ready to guide yourself towards a useful dosing schedule.

You can do so by using the following techniques. Consume as little as possible to start out with Fully read the label of your Delta 8 products. They will give you valuable information such as the quantity of Delta 8 THC you’ll consume along with the time it takes to activate after consumption Balance your consumption of Delta 8 by utilizing a range of products. Some are better for all-day relief, others are more suited for rapid, short-term results If you feel yourself consuming more than you’d wish, taking some time off of cannabinoids will help reduce your elevated tolerance Thankfully, people often note that Delta 8 THC consumption offers many of the benefits of its better-known counterpart, Delta 9 THC, but doesn’t include an overpowering psychoactive effect. For many, this benefit alone is enough to convince them to try out a THC product for the first time.

If you’re curious yourself, come back to this guide of where to buy the best Delta 8 THC products online at any time.If eating was as simple as filling a car with gas, we would strictly nourish ourselves for energy purposes. In reality, we sometimes eat when we don’t need to. People snack when they’re stressed or sad. We may, for example, try to make the most of a breakfast buffet, or spot a lonely cookie in the cupboard. It’s the equivalent of circling back to the gas station despite a full tank of it — completely absurd.

Except, filling up your car and eating aren’t exactly the same. Unless you find the bright lights and diesel fumes particularly thrilling, you won’t get the same dopamine rush that comes from munching on a Twix. In fact, the high fat and sugar content of processed foods activate the brain’s reward pathways and drive us to consume more. Studies have shown that calorific food can modify brain structure by stimulating neural pathways that encourage us to seek out more food, more often. Scientists also believe that overeating energy-dense food is an example of a learned behavior.

If tasty food is consumed regularly in the same context, then we may come to associate random things in our environments with eating. Associating food, or other stimuli, with unrelated cues is known as classical conditioning. This phenomenon was first demonstrated by the Russian scientist Ivan Pavlov. Pavlov trained dogs to associate the sight of food with the sound of a metronome. After just a few trials, the ticking sound alone caused the pups to drool in anticipation of their dinner.

Enticing EnvironmentsHumans are no more complex. We’re able to group together eating with almost anything, like the time of day, certain emotions or watching TV. Research has shown that we’re even capable of associating food with the most arbitrary surroundings.In a 2013 study published in Appetite, participants donned a virtual reality headset and wandered around an Italian plaza and a Japanese martial arts studio. Half of the participants received a chocolate milkshake in the plaza, while the other half were given theirs in the martial arts studio. After a handful of repetitions, the participants generated more saliva and felt hungrier in the room where the conditioning took place.

It’s not just mouth-watering and food cravings that occur in response to an environmental trigger. Our entire bodies prime us to chow down. We accordingly release digestive hormones, secrete gastric juices and activate neuronal pathways that are involved in eating. Once someone has experienced conditioning, it’s powerful enough to override nutritional needs and stimulate eating in the absence of authentic hunger. Many researchers believe it plays an important, yet undervalued, role in the obesity epidemic and the development of binge-eating disorders.

Though researchers have looked into the concept of food conditioning since Pavlov conducted his canine experiments over a century ago, only recently have they discovered which brain section is involved in learned eating behavior. In fact, a group of scientists at the Agency for Science, Technology and Research in Singapore stumbled across the neuronal circuitry involved in learned overeating by chance. They were carrying out experiments to discern the function of a group of neurons within the hypothalamus, the brain region responsible for appetite regulation, sexual arousal and other processes crucial to survival. Artificial activation of the neuronal cluster called tuberal somatostatin neurons caused mice to compulsively overeat — even when they were already full. These neurons are specifically activated whenever we gaze at sugary or fatty foods.

Research published by the same group earlier this year in Nature Neuroscience revealed that the cluster is directly linked to another part of the hypothalamus called the ventral subiculum. While the tuberal neurons flood our brains with dopamine in response to high-calorie foods, the subiculum responds by taking a mental "snapshot" of our surroundings. The connection between the two brain regions therefore ties the dopamine-inducing sensations of yummy food with one’s surroundings. The more we unconsciously associate eating with an environmental cue, the stronger the neural connection. In absence of conditioning, these neurons only drive us to eat when we feel hungry.

That’s thanks to elevated levels of a hunger hormone called ghrelin, which partially activates tuberal somatostatin neurons, explains lead study author Yu Fu. When a mouse repeatedly gobbles delicious food in a certain location, the subiculum-to-tuberal pathway grows so strong that the neurons don’t need to be primed by hunger. €œThe environment itself can override the absence of hunger and drive the animal to eat,” Fu says. Mind-Driven HungerEvolution could explain the integration of spatial information with the presence of appetizing food. As hunter-gatherers, a dearth of energy-rich food resources primed human brains to pay close attention to the environment in case they happened across a promising hunt.

In this context, the subiculum would take a mental note of one’s surroundings and trigger food-seeking behavior if they encountered a similar setting in the future. In times of scarcity, this was a matter of life and death. Nowadays, when fried chicken comes in buckets and can be delivered to your door within the hour, the environment’s ability to stimulate eating can be maladaptive and detrimental to one’s health.Studies have shown that food consumption among obese individuals is, on average, more likely to reflect conditioned responses and is influenced more so by external cues than by internal hunger sensations. But it isn’t clear why some people are more susceptible to food conditioning than others. Interestingly, vulnerability to food cues can be inherited, suggesting that some people have a genetic predisposition to learned overeating.

A possible culprit. Variations in genes linked to obesity, such as FTO, which are associated with elevated ghrelin levels. Relatively high levels of the appetite-stimulating hormone could increase the sensitivity of tuberal somatostatin activity, although other genetic variations could also play a role. Environment likely matters, too, and research has suggested that relatively long work hours and specific geographic location (as opposed to income, as commonly theorized) may significantly influence greater fast-food consumption. Parents who spend more time at their jobs could, for example, introduce these dietary habits to their children who carry them on through adulthood.

However, conditioned eating can be overcome by “exposure therapy,” as demonstrated by studies in mice and humans. By exposing ourselves to our environmental triggers and resisting food, the conditioned association is not reinforced. Instead, we teach ourselves that the food cue doesn’t always facilitate eating and can weaken the learned response. Although the clinical applications of learned overeating remain in their infancy, this type of behavioral therapy may offer a future alternative to expensive and potentially risky surgical procedures. Instead of gastric bypass surgery, meditation in McDonald’s might be just what the doctor orders.This article contains affiliate links to products.

We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. If you weigh more than 250 pounds, then you’ll likely find that most standard mattresses aren’t able to keep you comfortable and supported throughout the night. Unfortunately, many mattress manufacturers design their mattresses for individuals who weigh 250 pounds or less. An individual’s body weight can greatly impact how a mattress feels. The majority of individuals who weigh more than 250 pounds will feel most comfortable on a firmer and more supportive mattress.

Mattresses that aren’t firm enough or aren’t constructed using the right materials are also more likely to sag after a short period of time, especially under the weight of a heavier individual. Finding the best mattress for heavy people can be a challenge. As we mentioned above, most standard mattresses are only designed with a recommended weight limit of 250 pounds. Fortunately, there are some companies that design their products to support individuals weighing 300 pounds or more. If you’re on the hunt for the right mattress to support a more solid or muscular body type that won’t sag, we’re here to help.

We’ve put together a list of some of the best mattresses on the market that will offer the support, bounce, and comfort you’re searching for. We’ve also included some information to help you learn more about why mattresses sag, which materials will increase the lifespan of a mattress, and some shopping tips to keep in mind as you look for the best mattress for your body shape. Why Do Mattresses Sag?. Before we share our picks for the best no sag mattresses, let’s take just a moment to discuss some of the reasons that mattresses lose firmness and support over time. Nearly all mattresses will sag a bit as they contour to your body from repeated use.

Foams and other fabrics naturally soften over time, and the coils on innerspring and hybrid mattresses may lose a bit of tension over the years. A small amount of sag in a mattress is normal. For those people who sleep on their side, a little sag can actually be a good thing in helping the mattress to better conform to the body and relieve pressure. However, while very mild sag is common and not a huge concern, a mattress that sags too much can prevent individuals from keeping their spine in alignment as they sleep. This sagging can make it difficult to get comfortable overnight and can also cause back, neck, hip, and shoulder pain the following day.

There are a few main reasons why a mattress may sag too much. use of lower quality materials, uneven loads, damage from liquids, and poor foundations. Use of lower quality materials. One of the primary reasons mattresses sag is due to cheaper materials that are not made to withstand to the weight of one individual (or two individuals) laying on the mattress repeatedly. For example, some cheaper mattresses are made using polyurethane foam or lower density memory foams.

These foams just can’t compare to higher quality foams in terms of their structural durability and lifespan. More durable materials help prevent indentations and sagging. Uneven loads. When the load on a mattress isn’t evenly spread out, it can sometimes lead to sagging. The more highly used areas will become less supportive than the rest of the bed.

Turning a mattress (or flipping it if the design allows) can help ensure more even use and limit sagging. Damage from liquids. If liquids penetrate a mattress’ cover, it can cause damage to the materials in the mattress and compromise their ability to provide the intended level of support. While some mattress covers are water resistant, it still may be a good idea to purchase a separate waterproof cover to prevent this potential problem. Poor foundations.

Placing your mattress on the wrong foundation can deprive it of the critical support needed to prevent sagging. For example, foundations that have slats, especially ones that are more spaced out, can cause the mattress to sag in the gaps between the boards. Many mattress manufacturers recommend a specific foundation type for their products. Check with these recommendations to help prevent sag (and in some cases to avoid invalidating your warranty). The Science Behind Long-Lasting Mattresses When you’re looking for mattresses that don’t sag, paying close attention to the materials used to construct each option is important.

Some materials are less prone to sagging and more likely to help mattresses last beyond the average 7-to-10-year lifespan. Below are a few things to consider as you’re shopping for a mattress that won’t sag and will last a long time. Foam type. Some foam types are less likely than others to sag. Latex foams tend to be more durable and longer lasting than memory foam or polyfoam.

Memory foam can stop returning back to its original shape with repeated use. Overtime, this wear can lead to more sagging. While latex may sag slightly after about 5 years of use, its degradation should be much less noticeable than memory foam. If you prefer the feel of memory foam, look for mattresses made with high-density foam. Coils.

Coils can help with preventing sag due to the additional support that they provide. Pocketed coils are less likely to sag than mattresses with innerspring coils because each coil is responds to motion independent of the other coils on the bed. Choosing a hybrid mattress could allow you to enjoy a softer foam or latex sleep surface along with more supportive and sag-resistant coils. The Best Mattresses for Heavy Individuals Our top three picks for the best mattress for heavy people are featured below. These mattresses offer a higher weight limit than standard options on the market and can provide the support heavier individuals need to sleep comfortably and wake up without pain.

GhostBed Flex Luxury Hybrid Mattress When you’re searching for the best mattress for heavy people, one of the top options on your list should be the GhostBed Flex. This mattress is able to support up to 750 pounds when used with a strong foundation. GhostBed recommends that individuals weighing over 300 pounds purchase the king-size GhostBed Flex with their king GhostBed All-in-One Foundation to minimize sag and provide the best support, This hybrid mattress offers seven different layers with a total height of 13 inches to ensure that all individuals, including those with a heavier body weight, can sleep peacefully throughout the night. It has a medium firm level (a 6 to 7 out of 10 on the firmness scale) to provide enough support and to keep larger individuals from sinking too deeply into the mattress while still providing contouring to relieve pressure points. The mattress features two layers of gel memory foam that work to cradle the body and to keep the spine in alignment.

Beneath the two memory foam layers is GhostBed’s exclusive Ghost Bounce layer. This material offers additional support and responsiveness to keep heavier individuals comfortable. The Ghost Bounce material is able to contour to a body like memory foam while also being responsive to position changes like latex. The high-density support layer combined with the individually-wrapped and reinforced coils are two additional features that make the GhostBed Flex a good choice for heavier individuals. The pocketed coils increase how supportive the mattress is and provide it with enhanced edge support.

The high-density base further increases the overall durability of the mattress. If you tend to get warm overnight, then you’ll also love the cooling features integrated into this mattress’ design. GhostBed’s Ghost Ice cover is cool-to-the touch, and a special cooling fiber is also woven into the cover to deliver bursts of air to prevent overheating. DreamCloud Luxury Hybrid Mattress The quality and durable materials used to manufacture the DreamCloud make it a great selection when you’re searching for mattresses that don’t sag for larger and more muscular individuals. This mattress features a 5-layer design to contour and support each sleeper’s body shape.

The cashmere and quilted foam cover is soft and breathable to keep individuals cool as they rest. A pressure-relief layer sits below the cover for added comfort. The gel memory foam of this layer allows it to contour to an individual’s body to deliver relief from pressure points and the pain that comes with them. DreamCloud calls the third layer the “Sink-In-Just-Right Layer.” As the name suggests, this layer is designed to provide proper cradling, without causing individuals to sink too deeply and bottom out the mattress. The individually-wrapped coils in the next layer are another feature that make this mattress a good choice for heavier individuals.

These coils ensure that the mattress will deliver sufficient support to prevent sagging from higher body weights. Additionally, the reinforced edge provides sleepers with a larger usable sleep surface to more evenly distribute their weight and makes it easier to get into and out of bed. The final layer of the DreamCloud Luxury Hybrid Mattress is the high-density base layer which increases the overall durability of the mattress and help the other layers function properly. This mattress is rated as a 6.5 out of 10 on the firmness scale, which should accommodate sleepers of different weights as well as those with different sleep position preferences. This flexibility makes it a good option to consider for couples with different weights or sleep styles who share a bed.

Puffy Lux Hybrid Mattress The Puffy Lux is another one of the best no sag mattresses for heavier individuals. The twin, twin XL, and full-size Puffy Lux can support individuals weighing up to 350 pounds. The queen, king, and California king sizes are designed to support up to 350 pounds on each side, for a total of up to 700 pounds. The Puffy Lux is a hybrid memory foam mattress with a 6-layer system that allows it to contour to an individual’s body, alleviate pressure points and pain, and help regulate body temperatures for a cool and comfortable night’s sleep. The top layer is a soft and hypoallergenic cover that keeps the mattress clean and promotes healthy sleep.

Beneath the cover are three foam layers. a 1.5-inch Cooling Cloud Foam that is infused with gel to keep individuals cool overnight, a 1.5-inch Plush Dual Cloud Foam material to provide pressure point relief, and a 2-inch Climate Comfort Foam layer to wick moisture away and help individuals regulate their body temperature. A 7-inch layer with contour-adapt coils and high-density foam forms the mattress’ base. These materials help increase the overall support the mattress offers for heavier individuals, help it to adapt to changes in sleeping positions throughout the night, increase its stability, and provide edge support. How Do Companies Set Weight Limits for their Mattresses?.

You may be wondering how companies determine the weight limit for a mattress and whether you can really trust the claims various manufacturers make. Mattresses are tested to see how well they will hold up with repeated use and some companies may share these reports with their customers. One test that is used during the process is the rollator test. For this analysis, a machine runs a heavy roller repeatedly across a mattress as a way to simulate years of use (the specific number of cycles can vary by manufacturer). Whereas many manufacturers use a roller weighing about 240 pounds, some mattress companies will use a heavier roller to simulate a larger individual sleeping on the bed.

After the rollator test is conducted, the mattress is evaluated for loss of firmness and changes in mattress height. Mattress companies use this information to determine whether their mattresses can support individuals with higher weights. A second test, called the Cornell test, is also conducted to assess the impact of individuals sitting on the mattress. After each simulation, the mattress is again checked for changes in firmness and surface height. What to Consider When Shopping for a Mattress for Heavier Individuals We’ve put together a brief buying guide to help you select the best mattress for heavy people.

Using the criteria outline below can help you identify which features to look for in a mattress to ensure you are satisfied with the selection you make. Support Finding a mattress that is supportive enough to hold the weight of a heavier individual is essential. Mattresses that aren’t supportive enough can cause, or exacerbate existing, back pain. Choose mattresses with high-grade, individually pocketed coils, combined with high-density foam to ensure you receive the support you need to sleep comfortably and wake up without pain. Durable Materials The extra weight placed on a mattress by a heavier individual can put greater strain on the underlying materials and cause them to degrade more quickly.

Choosing mattresses made using high-quality and durable materials will minimize the effect of the additional weight on the mattress and help it to last longer without sagging or other issues. Again, mattresses made using high-density foams and individually pocketed coils will be more durable and longer-lasting than lower density foam options or innerspring mattresses. Options with more tightly packed pocketed coils can have a longer useful life. Mattress Thickness Generally speaking, a thicker mattress (with a taller height) will be a better choice for a heavier individual. The added height and layers can help ensure the mattress offers the optimal support for a bigger individual.

With a mattress that is too thin, a heavier person’s weight could cause them to sink through multiple layers of the mattress, even potentially down to the foundation. Also look at how thick the comfort (or top layer) on a mattress is. Choosing a mattress with a thicker comfort layer can be a good choice for heavier individuals. Thicker comfort layers can also prevent sleepers from ‘bottoming out’ the mattress by pressing their body weight through the entire comfort layer, making the mattress feel too hard. Edge Support If you’ve ever sat on the edge of a bed and felt like you were sliding off, it probably means that the mattress had poor edge support.

Edge support specifies how supportive the outer seam of a mattress is. Mattresses with good edge support will make it easier to sit on the edge of the bed and get into and out of bed without feeling like you’re going to fall off. Greater edge support also provides a larger sleeping surface because you can use more of the bed’s total width for sleeping. Choosing a hybrid or innerspring mattress will typically provide the greatest amount of edge support. Some manufacturers also design their products with reinforced edges to provide additional stability.

Cooling Properties A mattress with cooling features that help dissipate heat can be a good choice for individuals who tend to get too warm when they sleep. Gel-infused foams, air channels, phase-change materials, and coils can all help prevent you from overheating as you sleep. Sleeping Position and Firmness Finally, don’t forget to think about your preferred sleeping position and the firmness of each mattress. Spinal alignment is key when considering alternative firmness levels. Thinking about your sleep position and which parts of your body should, or should not, sink into the mattress can help you determine the ideal firmness for your body If you sleep on your side, then you’ll want to ensure that you choose a mattress with some cushioning and softness to offer pressure relief for your shoulders and hips.

A thicker comfort layer will be important to prevent softer mattress from sagging down to the foundation from the additional weight. If you are a back sleeper, you’ll likely prefer a firmer mattress. However, it will need to be soft enough to ensure the spine stays in alignment by allowing the hips to sink in a bit. Stomach sleepers do best on a firm mattress that will keep their hips from sinking in. Combination sleepers that switch between two or more sleep positions overnight will need to balance these firmness needs.

Many hybrid mattresses with a medium firmness rating will provide the most comfort for combination sleepers. Frequently Asked Questions Can a heavier person use an adjustable base?. Definitely!. Adjustable bases are great for bigger people and can easily handle the weight of even the largest folks. I go more in-depth here and id suggest checking this article out, there are a lot of benefits to an adjustable base that are worth looking into.

How can you stop a mattress from sagging?. Once a mattress has started sagging (especially with an indentation of over 1 inch), there isn’t much you can do to reverse the decline. However, there are steps you can take to protect a newer mattress from sagging. These include. Changing the position where you sleep and/or switching sides with a partner every week Choosing a supportive foundation (many manufacturers recommend specific foundation types for their mattresses) Choosing slatted frames with less than 3 inches between the slats Do memory foam mattresses sag?.

Yes, memory foam mattresses can sag. Over time, memory foam won’t completely return to its original shape. This issue can be especially true if the same area of the bed is slept on each and every night. Changing the part of the bed you sleep on and choosing mattresses made with high-density memory foam can help minimize sag. Do mattresses have a weight limit?.

Yes, all mattresses have a weight limit. However, the weight limit can vary quite a bit between different models and manufacturers. Many standard mattresses are only designed to be used by individuals who weigh up to 250 pounds. What is the best type of mattress for a heavy person?. Hybrid mattresses are better for heavier individuals than all-foam models.

The coils on hybrid mattresses enable them to support more weight.As fall closes in, conversations about what the season might bring during the lasix are ramping up — and include chatter about hypertension medications booster shots.Additional, delayed doses are a routine part of several vaccination schedules that most Americans have received. It's not clear yet if extra hypertension medications shots are necessary for everyone. But experts say that the possibility of additional doses of the hypertension medications treatment isn’t too surprising, since immunologists are essentially working to protect people from a new lasix as fast as possible. Betting On BoostersBoosters — a term that often refers to shots given six months or more after the first injections — are a routine part of certain vaccination procedures in the U.S. For example, the Tdap shot, which covers tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis, is something adults should receive every five to 10 years.

Most booster formulas are identical to the earlier doses, says Birgit Weinberger, an immunologist at University of Innsbruck in Austria. Boosters serve to bolster our protections from whatever disease they guard against, says Walter Orenstein, a physician who specializing in immunizations at Emory University. Typically, there are three main reasons why our immune systems might need the boost.One is that it’s possible some people’s immune systems might need another chance to learn the right defense strategy. Measles, for example, used to be a one-dose treatment. But when kids went off to school and spent more time with others, it turned out that some hadn’t built up the protection they were supposed to, Orenstein says.

To make sure everyone developed the baseline immunity they needed, the CDC and its advisory committee, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, added another measles shot to the immunization schedule. The same situation explains why some people, like those with compromised immune systems, are receiving a third hypertension medications shot right now. It’s possible their immune systems failed to get it right the first time around.Another reason we might get booster shots is because our immunity from the first injections is waning. Meningococcal immunity can fade, for example, which is why the recommended vaccination schedule calls for a second dose a few years later, Orenstein says. Lastly, it’s also possible we end up needing to schedule another doctor’s appointment because the pathogen we are vaccinated against has changed enough that it’s dodging our defenses.

That’s the main reason why we get flu treatments every year, Orenstein says. New flu variants typically crop up each fall. Since a pathogen can move though the population and change at the same time that our individual immune responses weaken, it's important for scientists to determine whether a booster shot uses the same formula as before, or if they should develop a new recipe. Maybe the lasix mutates so drastically that a new ingredient list is needed — or maybe the lasix hasn't changed much and our protection has just faded, so another shot of the same formula will do the trick. Building In A GapVaccination schedules that ask people to come back for more shots months (or even years) later may seem somewhat inconvenient.

But our immune system responds well to the large gap between shots, Weinberger says. The delay appears to drive home a long-term immune system memory of a pathogen. There are a few factors that shape the injection timeline the CDC settles on for a particular treatment. Typically, treatment makers choose the initial schedule used in trials, Orenstein says. The company researchers pick timing they think will be safe and effective, and can change depending on shot ingredients.

For example, treatments that use dead or inactivated versions of the actual lasix typically put more time between doses than other kinds of treatments, Orenstein says.With measles, the later booster shot appeared after the treatment itself was in use. Health care providers realized kids needed more protection, and so it became part of standard practice. That a similar conversation is happening around hypertension medications treatments right now doesn’t surprise Weinberger. Many of the treatments that require delayed booster shots are meant to protect us from pathogens we (hopefully) haven’t encountered on our own, says Weinberger. While it also protects people who have caught hypertension, the hypertension medications treatment still provides protection against the lasix for people who haven’t been exposed yet.

And if our immunity against, say, hepatitis B can fade and benefit from another shot much later, it makes sense to Weinberger that something similar would happen with hypertension medications vaccinations. €œI think for the immunologists, it's not surprising that this was not immunity for eternity,” she says. It also makes sense that the original vaccination schedule proposed by developers didn’t include a shot administered six months later. When a new lasix is tearing through communities, getting people protection against the lasix quickly is important. If testing were to plow ahead with a treatment dose schedule that has trial participants wait six to twelve months to get a third shot, that would mean six to twelve months of waiting while the lasix continued on — and then waiting even longer after the third dose to see how patients fared.

"Nobody would have gone for that study design, and rightly so," Weinberger says. "No way that you can wait for that." Sticking with one or two doses allowed development to go faster at a point when time was critical.Whether or not we eventually need extra shots, it’s important to stay flexible, Orenstein says. €œWe have to be prepared to make changes.” Recording systems need to account for every case of hypertension medications that happens, and note if the person was vaccinated. If they were, researchers need to know if their protection was waning or if the lasix was different enough to overcome it.

Does lasix increase potassium

	Lasix	Nitroglycerin	Isoptin sr	Zebeta	Cartia xt
Prescription is needed	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes
Buy with credit card	Yes	REFILL	Yes	Online	No
Take with alcohol	Ask your Doctor			You need consultation	90mg

SALT LAKE does lasix increase potassium CITY, Oct http://pgecapital.com/buy-kamagra-oral-jelly-uk/. 27, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Health Catalyst, Inc. ("Health Catalyst", does lasix increase potassium Nasdaq.

HCAT), a leading provider of data and analytics technology and services to healthcare organizations, will release its 2021 third quarter operating results on Tuesday, November 9, 2021, after market close. In conjunction, the company will does lasix increase potassium host a conference call to review the results at 5 p.m. E.T.

On the same day. Conference Call Details The conference call can be does lasix increase potassium accessed by dialing (877) 295-1104 for U.S. Participants, or (470) 495-9486 for international participants, and referencing participant code 9356638.

A live does lasix increase potassium audio webcast will be available online at https://ir.healthcatalyst.com/. A replay of the call will be available via webcast for on-demand listening shortly after the completion of the call, at the same web link, and will remain available for approximately 90 days. About Health Catalyst does lasix increase potassium Health Catalyst is a leading provider of data and analytics technology and services to healthcare organizations committed to being the catalyst for massive, measurable, data-informed healthcare improvement.

Its customers leverage the cloud-based data platform—powered by data from more than 100 million patient records and encompassing trillions of facts—as well as its analytics software and professional services expertise to make data-informed decisions and realize measurable clinical, financial, and operational improvements. Health Catalyst envisions a future in which all healthcare decisions are data informed. Health Catalyst Investor Relations Contact does lasix increase potassium.

Adam BrownSenior Vice President, Investor Relations and FP&A+1 (855)-309-6800ir@healthcatalyst.com Health Catalyst Media Contact. Amanda Hundt+1 (575)-491-0974amanda.hundt@healthcatalyst.comSALT does lasix increase potassium LAKE CITY, Sept. 22, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Health Catalyst, Inc.

("Health Catalyst", does lasix increase potassium Nasdaq. HCAT), a leading provider of data and analytics technology and services to healthcare organizations, today announced that Bryan Hunt, CFO, and Adam Brown, SVP of Investor Relations and FP&A, will participate in Cantor Global Healthcare Conference including a fireside chat presentation on Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 1:20 p.m. ET.

A webcast link will be available does lasix increase potassium at https://ir.healthcatalyst.com/investor-relations. About Health Catalyst Health Catalyst is a leading provider of data and analytics technology and services to healthcare organizations committed to being the catalyst for massive, measurable, data-informed healthcare improvement. Its customers leverage the cloud-based data platform—powered by data from more than 100 million does lasix increase potassium patient records and encompassing trillions of facts—as well as its analytics software and professional services expertise to make data-informed decisions and realize measurable clinical, financial, and operational improvements.

Health Catalyst envisions a future in which all healthcare decisions are data informed. Health Catalyst Investor does lasix increase potassium Relations Contact. Adam BrownSenior Vice President, Investor Relations and FP&A+1 (855)-309-6800ir@healthcatalyst.com Health Catalyst Media Contact.

Amanda Hundtamanda.hundt@healthcatalyst.com+1 (575) 491-0974.

SALT LAKE lasix price CITY, Oct site link. 27, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Health Catalyst, Inc. ("Health Catalyst", lasix price Nasdaq.

HCAT), a leading provider of data and analytics technology and services to healthcare organizations, will release its 2021 third quarter operating results on Tuesday, November 9, 2021, after market close. In conjunction, the company will host a conference call to review lasix price the results at 5 p.m. E.T.

On the same day. Conference Call Details The conference call can be accessed by dialing (877) 295-1104 for U.S lasix price. Participants, or (470) 495-9486 for international participants, and referencing participant code 9356638.

A live audio lasix price webcast will be available online at https://ir.healthcatalyst.com/. A replay of the call will be available via webcast for on-demand listening shortly after the completion of the call, at the same web link, and will remain available for approximately 90 days. About Health Catalyst Health Catalyst is a leading provider of data and analytics technology and services to healthcare organizations committed to being the catalyst lasix price for massive, measurable, data-informed healthcare improvement.

Its customers leverage the cloud-based data platform—powered by data from more than 100 million patient records and encompassing trillions of facts—as well as its analytics software and professional services expertise to make data-informed decisions and realize measurable clinical, financial, and operational improvements. Health Catalyst envisions a future in which all healthcare decisions are data informed. Health Catalyst Investor Relations lasix price Contact.

Adam BrownSenior Vice President, Investor Relations and FP&A+1 (855)-309-6800ir@healthcatalyst.com Health Catalyst Media Contact. Amanda Hundt+1 (575)-491-0974amanda.hundt@healthcatalyst.comSALT LAKE CITY, lasix price Sept. 22, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Health Catalyst, Inc.

("Health Catalyst", lasix price Nasdaq. HCAT), a leading provider of data and analytics technology and services to healthcare organizations, today announced that Bryan Hunt, CFO, and Adam Brown, SVP of Investor Relations and FP&A, will participate in Cantor Global Healthcare Conference including a fireside chat presentation on Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 1:20 p.m. ET.

A webcast lasix price link will be available at https://ir.healthcatalyst.com/investor-relations. About Health Catalyst Health Catalyst is a leading provider of data and analytics technology and services to healthcare organizations committed to being the catalyst for massive, measurable, data-informed healthcare improvement. Its customers leverage the cloud-based data platform—powered by data from more than 100 million patient records and encompassing trillions of facts—as well as its analytics software and professional lasix price services expertise to make data-informed decisions and realize measurable clinical, financial, and operational improvements.

Health Catalyst envisions a future in which all healthcare decisions are data informed. Health Catalyst lasix price Investor Relations Contact. Adam BrownSenior Vice President, Investor Relations and FP&A+1 (855)-309-6800ir@healthcatalyst.com Health Catalyst Media Contact.

Amanda Hundtamanda.hundt@healthcatalyst.com+1 (575) 491-0974.

What side effects may I notice from Lasix?

Side effects that you should report to your doctor or health care professional as soon as possible:

• blood in urine or stools
• dry mouth
• fever or chills
• hearing loss or ringing in the ears
• irregular heartbeat
• muscle pain or weakness, cramps
• skin rash
• stomach upset, pain, or nausea
• tingling or numbness in the hands or feet
• unusually weak or tired
• vomiting or diarrhea
• yellowing of the eyes or skin

Side effects that usually do not require medical attention (report to your doctor or health care professional if they continue or are bothersome):

• headache
• loss of appetite
• unusual bleeding or bruising

This list may not describe all possible side effects.

Can i buy lasix

His health care is Purchase propecia covered by Medicare, and can i buy lasix Medicaid and the QMB program pick up his Medicare cost-sharing obligations. Under Medicare Part B, his co-insurance is 20% of the Medicare-approved charge for most outpatient services. He went to the doctor recently and, as with any other Medicare beneficiary, the doctor handed him a bill for his co-pay. Now Joe has a can i buy lasix bill that he can’t pay. Read below to find out -- SHORT ANSWER.

QMB or Medicaid will pay the Medicare coinsurance only in limited situations. First, the provider must be a Medicaid provider can i buy lasix. Second, even if the provider accepts Medicaid, under recent legislation in New York enacted in 2015 and 2016, QMB or Medicaid may pay only part of the coinsurance, or none at all. This depends in part on whether the beneficiary has Original Medicare or is in a Medicare Advantage plan, and in part on the type of service. However, the bottom line can i buy lasix is that the provider is barred from "balance billing" a QMB beneficiary for the Medicare coinsurance.

Unfortunately, this creates tension between an individual and her doctors, pharmacies dispensing Part B medications, and other providers. Providers may not know they are not allowed to bill a QMB beneficiary for Medicare coinsurance, since they bill other Medicare beneficiaries. Even those who know may pressure their can i buy lasix patients to pay, or simply decline to serve them. These rights and the ramifications of these QMB rules are explained in this article. CMS is doing more education about QMB Rights.

The Medicare Handbook, since can i buy lasix 2017, gives information about QMB Protections. Download the 2020 Medicare Handbook here. See pp. 53, 86 can i buy lasix. 1.

To Which Providers will QMB or Medicaid Pay the Medicare Co-Insurance?. "Providers must enroll as Medicaid providers in order to bill Medicaid for the Medicare coinsurance." can i buy lasix CMS Informational Bulletin issued January 6, 2012, titled "Billing for Services Provided to Qualified Medicare Beneficiaries (QMBs). The CMS bulletin states, "If the provider wants Medicaid to pay the coinsurance, then the provider must register as a Medicaid provider under the state rules." If the provider chooses not to enroll as a Medicaid provider, they still may not "balance bill" the QMB recipient for the coinsurance. 2. How Does a Provider that DOES accept Medicaid can i buy lasix Bill for a QMB Beneficiary?.

If beneficiary has Original Medicare -- The provider bills Medicaid - even if the QMB Beneficiary does not also have Medicaid. Medicaid is required to pay the provider for all Medicare Part A and B cost-sharing charges for a QMB beneficiary, even if the service is normally not covered by Medicaid (ie, chiropractic, podiatry and clinical social work care). Whatever reimbursement can i buy lasix Medicaid pays the provider constitutes by law payment in full, and the provider cannot bill the beneficiary for any difference remaining. 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(n)(3)(A), NYS DOH 2000-ADM-7 If the QMB beneficiary is in a Medicare Advantage plan - The provider bills the Medicare Advantage plan, then bills Medicaid for the balance using a “16” code to get paid.

The provider must include the amount it can i buy lasix received from Medicare Advantage plan. 3. For a Provider who accepts Medicaid, How Much of the Medicare Coinsurance will be Paid for a QMB or Medicaid Beneficiary in NYS?. The answer to this question can i buy lasix has changed by laws enacted in 2015 and 2016. In the proposed 2019 State Budget, Gov.

Cuomo has proposed to reduce how much Medicaid pays for the Medicare costs even further. The amount Medicaid pays can i buy lasix is different depending on whether the individual has Original Medicare or is a Medicare Advantage plan, with better payment for those in Medicare Advantage plans. The answer also differs based on the type of service. Part A Deductibles and Coinsurance - Medicaid pays the full Part A hospital deductible ($1,408 in 2020) and Skilled Nursing Facility coinsurance ($176/day) for days 20 - 100 of a rehab stay. Full payment is made for QMB beneficiaries and Medicaid can i buy lasix recipients who have no spend-down.

Payments are reduced if the beneficiary has a Medicaid spend-down. For in-patient hospital deductible, Medicaid will pay only if six times the monthly spend-down has been met. For example, if Mary has a $200/month spend down which can i buy lasix has not been met otherwise, Medicaid will pay only $164 of the hospital deductible (the amount exceeding 6 x $200). See more on spend-down here. Medicare Part B - Deductible - Currently, Medicaid pays the full Medicare approved charges until the beneficiary has met the annual deductible, which is $198 in 2020.

For can i buy lasix example, Dr. John charges $500 for a visit, for which the Medicare approved charge is $198. Medicaid pays the entire $198, meeting the deductible. If the beneficiary has a spend-down, then the can i buy lasix Medicaid payment would be subject to the spend-down. In the 2019 proposed state budget, Gov.

Cuomo proposed to reduce the amount Medicaid pays toward the deductible to the same amount paid for coinsurance during the year, described below. This proposal was REJECTED can i buy lasix by the state legislature. Co-Insurance - The amount medicaid pays in NYS is different for Original Medicare and Medicare Advantage. If individual has Original Medicare, QMB/Medicaid will pay the 20% Part B coinsurance only to the extent the total combined payment the provider receives from Medicare and Medicaid is the lesser of the Medicaid or Medicare rate for the service. For example, if the Medicare rate for a service is can i buy lasix $100, the coinsurance is $20.

If the Medicaid rate for the same service is only $80 or less, Medicaid would pay nothing, as it would consider the doctor fully paid = the provider has received the full Medicaid rate, which is lesser than the Medicare rate. Exceptions - Medicaid/QMB wil pay the full coinsurance for the following services, regardless of the Medicaid rate. ambulance and psychologists - The Gov's 2019 proposal to eliminate these can i buy lasix exceptions was rejected. hospital outpatient clinic, certain facilities operating under certificates issued under the Mental Hygiene Law for people with developmental disabilities, psychiatric disability, and chemical dependence (Mental Hygiene Law Articles 16, 31 or 32). SSL 367-a, subd.

1(d)(iii)-(v) , as amended 2015 If individual is in a Medicare Advantage plan, 85% of the copayment will be paid to can i buy lasix the provider (must be a Medicaid provider), regardless of how low the Medicaid rate is. This limit was enacted in the 2016 State Budget, and is better than what the Governor proposed - which was the same rule used in Original Medicare -- NONE of the copayment or coinsurance would be paid if the Medicaid rate was lower than the Medicare rate for the service, which is usually the case. This would have deterred doctors and other providers from being willing to treat them. SSL 367-a, subd can i buy lasix. 1(d)(iv), added 2016.

EXCEPTIONS. The Medicare Advantage plan must pay the full coinsurance for the following services, regardless of the can i buy lasix Medicaid rate. ambulance ) psychologist ) The Gov's proposal in the 2019 budget to eliminate these exceptions was rejected by the legislature Example to illustrate the current rules. The Medicare rate for Mary's specialist visit is $185. The Medicaid can i buy lasix rate for the same service is $120.

Current rules (since 2016). Medicare Advantage -- Medicare Advantage plan pays $135 and Mary is charged a copayment of $50 (amount varies by plan). Medicaid pays the specialist 85% of the $50 copayment, which is $42.50 can i buy lasix. The doctor is prohibited by federal law from "balance billing" QMB beneficiaries for the balance of that copayment. Since provider is getting $177.50 of the $185 approved rate, provider will hopefully not be deterred from serving Mary or other QMBs/Medicaid recipients.

Original Medicare - can i buy lasix The 20% coinsurance is $37. Medicaid pays none of the coinsurance because the Medicaid rate ($120) is lower than the amount the provider already received from Medicare ($148). For both Medicare Advantage and Original Medicare, if the bill was for a ambulance or psychologist, Medicaid would pay the full 20% coinsurance regardless of the Medicaid rate. The proposal to eliminate this exception was rejected by can i buy lasix the legislature in 2019 budget. .

4. May the Provider 'Balance Bill" a QMB Benficiary for the Coinsurance if can i buy lasix Provider Does Not Accept Medicaid, or if Neither the Patient or Medicaid/QMB pays any coinsurance?. No. Balance billing is banned by the Balanced Budget Act of 1997. 42 U.S.C can i buy lasix.

§ 1396a(n)(3)(A). In an Informational Bulletin issued January 6, 2012, titled "Billing for Services Provided to Qualified Medicare Beneficiaries (QMBs)," the federal Medicare agency - CMS - clarified that providers MAY NOT BILL QMB recipients for the Medicare coinsurance. This is true whether or not the provider is registered as a can i buy lasix Medicaid provider. If the provider wants Medicaid to pay the coinsurance, then the provider must register as a Medicaid provider under the state rules. This is a change in policy in implementing Section 1902(n)(3)(B) of the Social Security Act (the Act), as modified by section 4714 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, which prohibits Medicare providers from balance-billing QMBs for Medicare cost-sharing.

The CMS letter states, "All Medicare physicians, providers, and suppliers who offer services and supplies to QMBs are prohibited from billing QMBs for Medicare cost-sharing, including can i buy lasix deductible, coinsurance, and copayments. This section of the Act is available at. CMCS Informational Bulletin http://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/ssact/title19/1902.htm. QMBs have no legal obligation to make further payment to can i buy lasix a provider or Medicare managed care plan for Part A or Part B cost sharing. Providers who inappropriately bill QMBs for Medicare cost-sharing are subject to sanctions.

Please note that the statute referenced above supersedes CMS State Medicaid Manual, Chapter 3, Eligibility, 3490.14 (b), which is no longer in effect, but may be causing confusion about QMB billing." The same information was sent to providers in this Medicare Learning Network bulletin, last revised in June 26, 2018. CMS reminded Medicare Advantage plans of the rule against Balance can i buy lasix Billing in the 2017 Call Letter for plan renewals. See this excerpt of the 2017 call letter by Justice in Aging - Prohibition on Billing Medicare-Medicaid Enrollees for Medicare Cost Sharing 5. How do QMB Beneficiaries Show a Provider that they have QMB and cannot be Billed for the Coinsurance?. It can can i buy lasix be difficult to show a provider that one is a QMB.

It is especially difficult for providers who are not Medicaid providers to identify QMB's, since they do not have access to online Medicaid eligibility systems Consumers can now call 1-800-MEDICARE to verify their QMB Status and report a billing issue. If a consumer reports a balance billng problem to this number, the Customer Service Rep can escalate the complaint to the Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC), which will send a compliance letter to the provider with a copy to the consumer. See CMS Medicare Learning Network Bulletin effective can i buy lasix Dec. 16, 2016. Medicare Summary Notices (MSNs) that Medicare beneficiaries receive every three months state that QMBs have no financial liability for co-insurance for each Medicare-covered service listed on the MSN.

The Remittance Advice (RA) that Medicare sends to can i buy lasix providers shows the same information. By spelling out billing protections on a service-by-service basis, the MSNs provide clarity for both the QMB beneficiary and the provider. Justice in Aging has posted samples of what the new MSNs look like here. They have also updated Justice in Aging’s Improper Billing Toolkit to incorporate references to the MSNs in its model letters that you can use to advocate for clients who can i buy lasix have been improperly billed for Medicare-covered services. CMS is implementing systems changes that will notify providers when they process a Medicare claim that the patient is QMB and has no cost-sharing liability.

The Medicare Summary Notice sent to the beneficiary will also state that the beneficiary has QMB and no liability. These changes were scheduled to can i buy lasix go into effect in October 2017, but have been delayed. Read more about them in this Justice in Aging Issue Brief on New Strategies in Fighting Improper Billing for QMBs (Feb. 2017). QMBs are issued a Medicaid benefit card (by mail), even if can i buy lasix they do not also receive Medicaid.

The card is the mechanism for health care providers to bill the QMB program for the Medicare deductibles and co-pays. Unfortunately, the Medicaid card does not indicate QMB eligibility. Not all people who have Medicaid also have QMB (they may have higher can i buy lasix incomes and "spend down" to the Medicaid limits. Advocates have asked for a special QMB card, or a notation on the Medicaid card to show that the individual has QMB. See this Report - a National Survey on QMB Identification Practices published by Justice in Aging, authored by Peter Travitsky, NYLAG EFLRP staff attorney.

The Report, published in March 2017, documents how QMB beneficiaries could be better can i buy lasix identified in order to ensure providers do not bill them improperly. What Codes the Provider Sees in eMedNY &. EPACES Medicaid eligibility system - see GIS 16 MA/005 - Changes to eMedNY for Certain Medicaid Recipient Coverage Codes (PDF) ​​​​​​​Recipient Coverage Code "09" is defined as "Medicare Savings Program only" (MSP) and is used along with an eMedNY Buy-in span and MSP code of "P" to define a Qualified Medicare Beneficiary (QMB). Providers will receive the following eligibility messages when verifying coverage can i buy lasix on EMEVS and ePaces. "Medicare coinsurance and deductible only" for individuals with Coverage Code 06 and an MSP code of P.

*Code 06 is "provisional Medicaid coverage" for Medicaid recipients found provisionally eligible for Medicaid, subject to meeting the spend-down. See more about provisional coverage here can i buy lasix. "Family Planning Benefit and Medicare Coinsurance and Ded" for individuals with Coverage Code 18 and an MSP code of P. "Code 18" is for Medicare beneficiaries who are enrolled in the Family Planning Benefit Program (FPBP), who are also income eligible for QMB. 6 can i buy lasix.

If you are Billed -​ Strategies Consumers can now call 1-800-MEDICARE to report a billing issue. If a consumer reports a balance billng problem to this number, the Customer Service Rep can escalate the complaint to the Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC), which will send a compliance letter to the provider with a copy to the consumer. See CMS can i buy lasix Medicare Learning Network Bulletin effective Dec. 16, 2016. Send a letter to the provider, using the Justice In Aging Model model letters to providers to explain QMB rights.​​​ both for Original Medicare (Letters 1-2) and Medicare Advantage (Letters 3-5) - see Overview of model letters.

Include a link to the can i buy lasix CMS Medicare Learning Network Notice. Prohibition on Balance Billing Dually Eligible Individuals Enrolled in the Qualified Medicare Beneficiary (QMB) Program (revised June 26. 2018) In January 2017, the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau issued this guide to QMB billing. A consumer who has a problem with debt collection, may also submit a complaint can i buy lasix online or call the CFPB at 1-855-411-2372. TTY/TDD users can call 1-855-729-2372.

Medicare Advantage members should complain to their Medicare Advantage plan. In its 2017 Call Letter, CMS stressed can i buy lasix to Medicare Advantage contractors that federal regulations at 42 C.F.R. § 422.504 (g)(1)(iii), require that provider contracts must prohibit collection of deductibles and co-payments from dual eligibles and QMBs. Toolkit to Help Protect QMB Rights ​​In July 2015, CMS issued a report, "Access to Care Issues Among Qualified Medicare Beneficiaries (QMB's)" documenting how pervasive illegal attempts to bill QMBs for the Medicare coinsurance, including those who are members of managed care plans. Justice in Aging, a national advocacy can i buy lasix organization, has a project to educate beneficiaries about balance billing and to advocate for stronger protections for QMBs.

Links to their webinars and other resources is at this link. Their information includes. September 4, 2009, updated 6/20/20 by Valerie Bogart, NYLAG can i buy lasix Author. Cathy Roberts. Author.

Geoffrey Hale can i buy lasix This article was authored by the Empire Justice Center.Some "dual eligible" beneficiaries (people who have Medicare and Medicaid) are entitled to receive reimbursement of their Medicare Part B premiums from New York State through the Medicare Insurance Premium Payment Program (MIPP). The Part B premium is $148.50 in 2021. MIPP is for some groups who are either not eligible for -- or who are not yet enrolled in-- the Medicare Savings Program (MSP), which is the main program that pays the Medicare Part B premium for low-income people. Some people are not eligible for an MSP even though they have full Medicaid with no can i buy lasix spend down. This is because they are in a special Medicaid eligibility category -- discussed below -- with Medicaid income limits that are actually HIGHER than the MSP income limits.

MIPP reimburses them for their Part B premium because they have “full Medicaid” (no spend down) but are ineligible for MSP because their income is above the MSP SLIMB level (120% of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL). Even if their income is under the QI-1 MSP level (135% FPL), someone can i buy lasix cannot have both QI-1 and Medicaid). Instead, these consumers can have their Part B premium reimbursed through the MIPP program. In this article. The MIPP program was established because the State determined that those who have full Medicaid and Medicare Part B should be reimbursed for their Part B premium, even if they do not qualify for MSP, because Medicare is considered cost effective third party health insurance, and because consumers must enroll in Medicare as a condition of eligibility for can i buy lasix Medicaid (See 89 ADM 7).

There are generally four groups of dual-eligible consumers that are eligible for MIPP. Therefore, many MBI WPD consumers have incomes higher than what MSP normally allows, but still have full Medicaid with no spend down. Those consumers can i buy lasix can qualify for MIPP and have their Part B premiums reimbursed. Here is an example. Sam is age 50 and has Medicare and MBI-WPD.

She gets $1500/mo gross from Social Security Disability and also can i buy lasix makes $400/month through work activity. $ 167.50 -- EARNED INCOME - Because she is disabled, the DAB earned income disregard applies. $400 - $65 = $335. Her countable earned income is 1/2 of can i buy lasix $335 = $167.50 + $1500.00 -- UNEARNED INCOME from Social Security Disability = $1,667.50 --TOTAL income. This is above the SLIMB limit of $1,288 (2021) but she can still qualify for MIPP.

2. Parent/Caretaker Relatives with MAGI-like Budgeting - can i buy lasix Including Medicare Beneficiaries. Consumers who fall into the DAB category (Age 65+/Disabled/Blind) and would otherwise be budgeted with non-MAGI rules can opt to use Affordable Care Act MAGI rules if they are the parent/caretaker of a child under age 18 or under age 19 and in school full time. This is referred to as “MAGI-like budgeting.” Under MAGI rules income can be up to 138% of the FPL—again, higher than the limit for DAB budgeting, which is equivalent to only 83% FPL. MAGI-like consumers can be enrolled in either MSP or MIPP, can i buy lasix depending on if their income is higher or lower than 120% of the FPL.

If their income is under 120% FPL, they are eligible for MSP as a SLIMB. If income is above 120% FPL, then they can enroll in MIPP. (See GIS 18 MA/001 - 2018 Medicaid Managed can i buy lasix Care Transition for Enrollees Gaining Medicare, #4) 3. New Medicare Enrollees who are Not Yet in a Medicare Savings Program When a consumer has Medicaid through the New York State of Health (NYSoH) Marketplace and then enrolls in Medicare when she turns age 65 or because she received Social Security Disability for 24 months, her Medicaid case is normally** transferred to the local department of social services (LDSS)(HRA in NYC) to be rebudgeted under non-MAGI budgeting. During the transition process, she should be reimbursed for the Part B premiums via MIPP.

However, the transition time can vary based on age can i buy lasix. AGE 65+ For those who enroll in Medicare at age 65+, the Medicaid case takes about four months to be rebudgeted and approved by the LDSS. The consumer is entitled to MIPP payments for at least three months during the transition. Once the can i buy lasix case is with the LDSS she should automatically be re-evaluated for MSP. Consumers UNDER 65 who receive Medicare due to disability status are entitled to keep MAGI Medicaid through NYSoH for up to 12 months (also known as continuous coverage, See NY Social Services Law 366, subd.

4(c). These consumers should receive MIPP payments for as can i buy lasix long as their cases remain with NYSoH and throughout the transition to the LDSS. NOTE during hypertension medications emergency their case may remain with NYSoH for more than 12 months. See here. See GIS 18 MA/001 - 2018 Medicaid Managed Care Transition for Enrollees can i buy lasix Gaining Medicare, #4 for an explanation of this process.

Note. During the hypertension medications emergency, those who have Medicaid through the NYSOH marketplace and enroll in Medicare should NOT have their cases transitioned to the LDSS. They should keep the same MAGI budgeting and automatically receive MIPP payments can i buy lasix. See GIS 20 MA/04 or this article on hypertension medications eligibility changes 4. Those with Special Budgeting after Losing SSI (DAC, Pickle, 1619b) Disabled Adult Child (DAC).

Special budgeting is available to those who are 18+ and lose SSI because they begin receiving Disabled Adult Child (DAC) can i buy lasix benefits (or receive an increase in the amount of their benefit). Consumer must have become disabled or blind before age 22 to receive the benefit. If the new DAC benefit amount was disregarded and the consumer would otherwise be eligible for SSI, they can keep Medicaid eligibility with NO SPEND DOWN. See this can i buy lasix article. Consumers may have income higher than MSP limits, but keep full Medicaid with no spend down.

Therefore, they are eligible for payment of their Part B premiums. See page 96 of the Medicaid can i buy lasix Reference Guide (Categorical Factors). If their income is lower than the MSP SLIMB threshold, they can be added to MSP. If higher than the threshold, they can be reimbursed via MIPP. See also 95-ADM-11 can i buy lasix.

Medical Assistance Eligibility for Disabled Adult Children, Section C (pg 8). Pickle &. 1619B. 5. When the Part B Premium Reduces Countable Income to Below the Medicaid Limit Since the Part B premium can be used as a deduction from gross income, it may reduce someone's countable income to below the Medicaid limit.

The consumer should be paid the difference to bring her up to the Medicaid level ($904/month in 2021). They will only be reimbursed for the difference between their countable income and $904, not necessarily the full amount of the premium. See GIS 02-MA-019. Reimbursement of Health Insurance Premiums MIPP and MSP are similar in that they both pay for the Medicare Part B premium, but there are some key differences. MIPP structures the payments as reimbursement -- beneficiaries must continue to pay their premium (via a monthly deduction from their Social Security check or quarterly billing, if they do not receive Social Security) and then are reimbursed via check.

In contrast, MSP enrollees are not charged for their premium. Their Social Security check usually increases because the Part B premium is no longer withheld from their check. MIPP only provides reimbursement for Part B. It does not have any of the other benefits MSPs can provide, such as. A consumer cannot have MIPP without also having Medicaid, whereas MSP enrollees can have MSP only.

Of the above benefits, Medicaid also provides Part D Extra Help automatic eligibility. There is no application process for MIPP because consumers should be screened and enrolled automatically (00 OMM/ADM-7). Either the state or the LDSS is responsible for screening &. Distributing MIPP payments, depending on where the Medicaid case is held and administered (14 /2014 LCM-02 Section V). If a consumer is eligible for MIPP and is not receiving it, they should contact whichever agency holds their case and request enrollment.

Unfortunately, since there is no formal process for applying, it may require some advocacy. If Medicaid case is at New York State of Health they should call 1-855-355-5777. Consumers will likely have to ask for a supervisor in order to find someone familiar with MIPP. If Medicaid case is with HRA in New York City, they should email mipp@hra.nyc.gov. If Medicaid case is with other local districts in NYS, call your local county DSS.

Once enrolled, it make take a few months for payments to begin. Payments will be made in the form of checks from the Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC), the fiscal agent for the New York State Medicaid program.

Now http://julieparticka.com/purchase-propecia/ Joe has a bill that he lasix price can’t pay. Read below to find out -- SHORT ANSWER. QMB or Medicaid will pay the Medicare coinsurance only in limited situations. First, the lasix price provider must be a Medicaid provider. Second, even if the provider accepts Medicaid, under recent legislation in New York enacted in 2015 and 2016, QMB or Medicaid may pay only part of the coinsurance, or none at all.

This depends in part on whether the beneficiary has Original Medicare or is in a Medicare Advantage plan, and in part on the type of service. However, the bottom line is that the provider is barred from "balance billing" a QMB beneficiary for lasix price the Medicare coinsurance. Unfortunately, this creates tension between an individual and her doctors, pharmacies dispensing Part B medications, and other providers. Providers may not know they are not allowed to bill a QMB beneficiary for Medicare coinsurance, since they bill other Medicare beneficiaries. Even those who know may pressure their lasix price patients to pay, or simply decline to serve them.

These rights and the ramifications of these QMB rules are explained in this article. CMS is doing more education about QMB Rights. The lasix price Medicare Handbook, since 2017, gives information about QMB Protections. Download the 2020 Medicare Handbook here. See pp.

53, 86 lasix price. 1. To Which Providers will QMB or Medicaid Pay the Medicare Co-Insurance?. "Providers must enroll as Medicaid providers in order to bill Medicaid for the Medicare coinsurance." CMS Informational Bulletin issued January 6, 2012, titled "Billing for Services Provided to Qualified Medicare lasix price Beneficiaries (QMBs). The CMS bulletin states, "If the provider wants Medicaid to pay the coinsurance, then the provider must register as a Medicaid provider under the state rules." If the provider chooses not to enroll as a Medicaid provider, they still may not "balance bill" the QMB recipient for the coinsurance.

2. How Does a Provider that DOES accept Medicaid Bill lasix price for a QMB Beneficiary?. If beneficiary has Original Medicare -- The provider bills Medicaid - even if the QMB Beneficiary does not also have Medicaid. Medicaid is required to pay the provider for all Medicare Part A and B cost-sharing charges for a QMB beneficiary, even if the service is normally not covered by Medicaid (ie, chiropractic, podiatry and clinical social work care). Whatever reimbursement Medicaid pays the provider constitutes by law payment in full, lasix price and the provider cannot bill the beneficiary for any difference remaining.

42 U.S.C. § 1396a(n)(3)(A), NYS DOH 2000-ADM-7 If the QMB beneficiary is in a Medicare Advantage plan - The provider bills the Medicare Advantage plan, then bills Medicaid for the balance using a “16” code to get paid. The provider must include lasix price the amount it received from Medicare Advantage plan. 3. For a Provider who accepts Medicaid, How Much of the Medicare Coinsurance will be Paid for a QMB or Medicaid Beneficiary in NYS?.

The answer to this question has changed by laws enacted in 2015 and lasix price 2016. In the proposed 2019 State Budget, Gov. Cuomo has proposed to reduce how much Medicaid pays for the Medicare costs even further. The amount Medicaid pays is different depending on whether the individual has Original Medicare or is a Medicare Advantage plan, lasix price with better payment for those in Medicare Advantage plans. The answer also differs based on the type of service.

Part A Deductibles and Coinsurance - Medicaid pays the full Part A hospital deductible ($1,408 in 2020) and Skilled Nursing Facility coinsurance ($176/day) for days 20 - 100 of a rehab stay. Full lasix price payment is made for QMB beneficiaries and Medicaid recipients who have no spend-down. Payments are reduced if the beneficiary has a Medicaid spend-down. For in-patient hospital deductible, Medicaid will pay only if six times the monthly spend-down has been met. For example, if Mary has a lasix price $200/month spend down which has not been met otherwise, Medicaid will pay only $164 of the hospital deductible (the amount exceeding 6 x $200).

See more on spend-down here. Medicare Part B - Deductible - Currently, Medicaid pays the full Medicare approved charges until the beneficiary has met the annual deductible, which is $198 in 2020. For example, Dr lasix price. John charges $500 for a visit, for which the Medicare approved charge is $198. Medicaid pays the entire $198, meeting the deductible.

If the beneficiary has a spend-down, then the Medicaid payment would be subject to the spend-down lasix price. In the 2019 proposed state budget, Gov. Cuomo proposed to reduce the amount Medicaid pays toward the deductible to the same amount paid for coinsurance during the year, described below. This lasix price proposal was REJECTED by the state legislature. Co-Insurance - The amount medicaid pays in NYS is different for Original Medicare and Medicare Advantage.

If individual has Original Medicare, QMB/Medicaid will pay the 20% Part B coinsurance only to the extent the total combined payment the provider receives from Medicare and Medicaid is the lesser of the Medicaid or Medicare rate for the service. For example, if the Medicare rate for a lasix price service is $100, the coinsurance is $20. If the Medicaid rate for the same service is only $80 or less, Medicaid would pay nothing, as it would consider the doctor fully paid = the provider has received the full Medicaid rate, which is lesser than the Medicare rate. Exceptions - Medicaid/QMB wil pay the full coinsurance for the following services, regardless of the Medicaid rate. ambulance and psychologists - The Gov's 2019 proposal to eliminate lasix price these exceptions was rejected.

hospital outpatient clinic, certain facilities operating under certificates issued under the Mental Hygiene Law for people with developmental disabilities, psychiatric disability, and chemical dependence (Mental Hygiene Law Articles 16, 31 or 32). SSL 367-a, subd. 1(d)(iii)-(v) , as amended 2015 If individual is in a Medicare Advantage plan, 85% of the copayment will lasix price be paid to the provider (must be a Medicaid provider), regardless of how low the Medicaid rate is. This limit was enacted in the 2016 State Budget, and is better than what the Governor proposed - which was the same rule used in Original Medicare -- NONE of the copayment or coinsurance would be paid if the Medicaid rate was lower than the Medicare rate for the service, which is usually the case. This would have deterred doctors and other providers from being willing to treat them.

SSL lasix price 367-a, subd. 1(d)(iv), added 2016. EXCEPTIONS. The Medicare Advantage lasix price plan must pay the full coinsurance for the following services, regardless of the Medicaid rate. ambulance ) psychologist ) The Gov's proposal in the 2019 budget to eliminate these exceptions was rejected by the legislature Example to illustrate the current rules.

The Medicare rate for Mary's specialist visit is $185. The Medicaid rate for the lasix price same service is $120. Current rules (since 2016). Medicare Advantage -- Medicare Advantage plan pays $135 and Mary is charged a copayment of $50 (amount varies by plan). Medicaid pays the specialist 85% of the $50 copayment, which lasix price is $42.50.

The doctor is prohibited by federal law from "balance billing" QMB beneficiaries for the balance of that copayment. Since provider is getting $177.50 of the $185 approved rate, provider will hopefully not be deterred from serving Mary or other QMBs/Medicaid recipients. Original Medicare - The 20% coinsurance is $37 lasix price. Medicaid pays none of the coinsurance because the Medicaid rate ($120) is lower than the amount the provider already received from Medicare ($148). For both Medicare Advantage and Original Medicare, if the bill was for a ambulance or psychologist, Medicaid would pay the full 20% coinsurance regardless of the Medicaid rate.

The proposal to lasix price eliminate this exception was rejected by the legislature in 2019 budget. . 4. May the Provider 'Balance Bill" a QMB Benficiary for the Coinsurance if Provider Does Not Accept Medicaid, or if Neither the Patient or Medicaid/QMB lasix price pays any coinsurance?. No.

Balance billing is banned by the Balanced Budget Act of 1997. 42 U.S.C lasix price. § 1396a(n)(3)(A). In an Informational Bulletin issued January 6, 2012, titled "Billing for Services Provided to Qualified Medicare Beneficiaries (QMBs)," the federal Medicare agency - CMS - clarified that providers MAY NOT BILL QMB recipients for the Medicare coinsurance. This is true whether lasix price or not the provider is registered as a Medicaid provider.

If the provider wants Medicaid to pay the coinsurance, then the provider must register as a Medicaid provider under the state rules. This is a change in policy in implementing Section 1902(n)(3)(B) of the Social Security Act (the Act), as modified by section 4714 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, which prohibits Medicare providers from balance-billing QMBs for Medicare cost-sharing. The CMS letter states, "All Medicare lasix price physicians, providers, and suppliers who offer services and supplies to QMBs are prohibited from billing QMBs for Medicare cost-sharing, including deductible, coinsurance, and copayments. This section of the Act is available at. CMCS Informational Bulletin http://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/ssact/title19/1902.htm.

QMBs have no legal obligation to make further payment to a provider or Medicare managed care plan for Part A or Part B cost lasix price sharing. Providers who inappropriately bill QMBs for Medicare cost-sharing are subject to sanctions. Please note that the statute referenced above supersedes CMS State Medicaid Manual, Chapter 3, Eligibility, 3490.14 (b), which is no longer in effect, but may be causing confusion about QMB billing." The same information was sent to providers in this Medicare Learning Network bulletin, last revised in June 26, 2018. CMS reminded Medicare Advantage plans of the rule against lasix price Balance Billing in the 2017 Call Letter for plan renewals. See this excerpt of the 2017 call letter by Justice in Aging - Prohibition on Billing Medicare-Medicaid Enrollees for Medicare Cost Sharing 5.

How do QMB Beneficiaries Show a Provider that they have QMB and cannot be Billed for the Coinsurance?. It can be difficult to show a provider that one is a QMB lasix price. It is especially difficult for providers who are not Medicaid providers to identify QMB's, since they do not have access to online Medicaid eligibility systems Consumers can now call 1-800-MEDICARE to verify their QMB Status and report a billing issue. If a consumer reports a balance billng problem to this number, the Customer Service Rep can escalate the complaint to the Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC), which will send a compliance letter to the provider with a copy to the consumer. See CMS Medicare Learning Network lasix price Bulletin effective Dec.

16, 2016. Medicare Summary Notices (MSNs) that Medicare beneficiaries receive every three months state that QMBs have no financial liability for co-insurance for each Medicare-covered service listed on the MSN. The Remittance Advice (RA) that Medicare sends lasix price to providers shows the same information. By spelling out billing protections on a service-by-service basis, the MSNs provide clarity for both the QMB beneficiary and the provider. Justice in Aging has posted samples of what the new MSNs look like here.

They have also updated Justice in Aging’s Improper Billing Toolkit to incorporate references to the MSNs in its model letters that you can use to lasix price advocate for clients who have been improperly billed for Medicare-covered services. CMS is implementing systems changes that will notify providers when they process a Medicare claim that the patient is QMB and has no cost-sharing liability. The Medicare Summary Notice sent to the beneficiary will also state that the beneficiary has QMB and no liability. These changes were scheduled to lasix price go into effect in October 2017, but have been delayed. Read more about them in this Justice in Aging Issue Brief on New Strategies in Fighting Improper Billing for QMBs (Feb.

2017). QMBs are lasix price issued a Medicaid benefit card (by mail), even if they do not also receive Medicaid. The card is the mechanism for health care providers to bill the QMB program for the Medicare deductibles and co-pays. Unfortunately, the Medicaid card does not indicate QMB eligibility. Not all people who have Medicaid also have QMB (they may have higher incomes and "spend down" to the Medicaid limits lasix price.

Advocates have asked for a special QMB card, or a notation on the Medicaid card to show that the individual has QMB. See this Report - a National Survey on QMB Identification Practices published by Justice in Aging, authored by Peter Travitsky, NYLAG EFLRP staff attorney. The lasix price Report, published in March 2017, documents how QMB beneficiaries could be better identified in order to ensure providers do not bill them improperly. What Codes the Provider Sees in eMedNY &. EPACES Medicaid eligibility system - see GIS 16 MA/005 - Changes to eMedNY for Certain Medicaid Recipient Coverage Codes (PDF) ​​​​​​​Recipient Coverage Code "09" is defined as "Medicare Savings Program only" (MSP) and is used along with an eMedNY Buy-in span and MSP code of "P" to define a Qualified Medicare Beneficiary (QMB).

Providers will receive the following eligibility messages when verifying coverage on lasix price EMEVS and ePaces. "Medicare coinsurance and deductible only" for individuals with Coverage Code 06 and an MSP code of P. *Code 06 is "provisional Medicaid coverage" for Medicaid recipients found provisionally eligible for Medicaid, subject to meeting the spend-down. See more about lasix price provisional coverage here. "Family Planning Benefit and Medicare Coinsurance and Ded" for individuals with Coverage Code 18 and an MSP code of P.

"Code 18" is for Medicare beneficiaries who are enrolled in the Family Planning Benefit Program (FPBP), who are also income eligible for QMB. 6 lasix price. If you are Billed -​ Strategies Consumers can now call 1-800-MEDICARE to report a billing issue. If a consumer reports a balance billng problem to this number, the Customer Service Rep can escalate the complaint to the Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC), which will send a compliance letter to the provider with a copy to the consumer. See CMS Medicare Learning Network Bulletin lasix price effective Dec.

16, 2016. Send a letter to the provider, using the Justice In Aging Model model letters to providers to explain QMB rights.​​​ both for Original Medicare (Letters 1-2) and Medicare Advantage (Letters 3-5) - see Overview of model letters. Include a link to the CMS Medicare Learning Network lasix price Notice. Prohibition on Balance Billing Dually Eligible Individuals Enrolled in the Qualified Medicare Beneficiary (QMB) Program (revised June 26. 2018) In January 2017, the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau issued this guide to QMB billing.

A consumer who has a lasix price problem with debt collection, may also submit a complaint online or call the CFPB at 1-855-411-2372. TTY/TDD users can call 1-855-729-2372. Medicare Advantage members should complain to their Medicare Advantage plan. In its 2017 Call Letter, CMS stressed to Medicare Advantage contractors that federal regulations at 42 C.F.R lasix price. § 422.504 (g)(1)(iii), require that provider contracts must prohibit collection of deductibles and co-payments from dual eligibles and QMBs.

Toolkit to Help Protect QMB Rights ​​In July 2015, CMS issued a report, "Access to Care Issues Among Qualified Medicare Beneficiaries (QMB's)" documenting how pervasive illegal attempts to bill QMBs for the Medicare coinsurance, including those who are members of managed care plans. Justice in Aging, a national advocacy organization, has a project to educate beneficiaries about balance billing and to advocate for stronger lasix price protections for QMBs. Links to their webinars and other resources is at this link. Their information includes. September 4, 2009, updated 6/20/20 by Valerie Bogart, NYLAG Author.

Cathy Roberts. Author. Geoffrey Hale This article was authored by the Empire Justice Center.Some "dual eligible" beneficiaries (people who have Medicare and Medicaid) are entitled to receive reimbursement of their Medicare Part B premiums from New York State through the Medicare Insurance Premium Payment Program (MIPP). The Part B premium is $148.50 in 2021. MIPP is for some groups who are either not eligible for -- or who are not yet enrolled in-- the Medicare Savings Program (MSP), which is the main program that pays the Medicare Part B premium for low-income people.

Some people are not eligible for an MSP even though they have full Medicaid with no spend down. This is because they are in a special Medicaid eligibility category -- discussed below -- with Medicaid income limits that are actually HIGHER than the MSP income limits. MIPP reimburses them for their Part B premium because they have “full Medicaid” (no spend down) but are ineligible for MSP because their income is above the MSP SLIMB level (120% of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL). Even if their income is under the QI-1 MSP level (135% FPL), someone cannot have both QI-1 and Medicaid). Instead, these consumers can have their Part B premium reimbursed through the MIPP program.

In this article. The MIPP program was established because the State determined that those who have full Medicaid and Medicare Part B should be reimbursed for their Part B premium, even if they do not qualify for MSP, because Medicare is considered cost effective third party health insurance, and because consumers must enroll in Medicare as a condition of eligibility for Medicaid (See 89 ADM 7). There are generally four groups of dual-eligible consumers that are eligible for MIPP. Therefore, many MBI WPD consumers have incomes higher than what MSP normally allows, but still have full Medicaid with no spend down. Those consumers can qualify for MIPP and have their Part B premiums reimbursed.

Here is an example. Sam is age 50 and has Medicare and MBI-WPD. She gets $1500/mo gross from Social Security Disability and also makes $400/month through work activity. $ 167.50 -- EARNED INCOME - Because she is disabled, the DAB earned income disregard applies. $400 - $65 = $335.

Her countable earned income is 1/2 of $335 = $167.50 + $1500.00 -- UNEARNED INCOME from Social Security Disability = $1,667.50 --TOTAL income. This is above the SLIMB limit of $1,288 (2021) but she can still qualify for MIPP. 2. Parent/Caretaker Relatives with MAGI-like Budgeting - Including Medicare Beneficiaries. Consumers who fall into the DAB category (Age 65+/Disabled/Blind) and would otherwise be budgeted with non-MAGI rules can opt to use Affordable Care Act MAGI rules if they are the parent/caretaker of a child under age 18 or under age 19 and in school full time.

This is referred to as “MAGI-like budgeting.” Under MAGI rules income can be up to 138% of the FPL—again, higher than the limit for DAB budgeting, which is equivalent to only 83% FPL. MAGI-like consumers can be enrolled in either MSP or MIPP, depending on if their income is higher or lower than 120% of the FPL. If their income is under 120% FPL, they are eligible for MSP as a SLIMB. If income is above 120% FPL, then they can enroll in MIPP. (See GIS 18 MA/001 - 2018 Medicaid Managed Care Transition for Enrollees Gaining Medicare, #4) 3.

New Medicare Enrollees who are Not Yet in a Medicare Savings Program When a consumer has Medicaid through the New York State of Health (NYSoH) Marketplace and then enrolls in Medicare when she turns age 65 or because she received Social Security Disability for 24 months, her Medicaid case is normally** transferred to the local department of social services (LDSS)(HRA in NYC) to be rebudgeted under non-MAGI budgeting. During the transition process, she should be reimbursed for the Part B premiums via MIPP. However, the transition time can vary based on age. AGE 65+ For those who enroll in Medicare at age 65+, the Medicaid case takes about four months to be rebudgeted and approved by the LDSS. The consumer is entitled to MIPP payments for at least three months during the transition.

Once the case is with the LDSS she should automatically be re-evaluated for MSP. Consumers UNDER 65 who receive Medicare due to disability status are entitled to keep MAGI Medicaid through NYSoH for up to 12 months (also known as continuous coverage, See NY Social Services Law 366, subd. 4(c). These consumers should receive MIPP payments for as long as their cases remain with NYSoH and throughout the transition to the LDSS. NOTE during hypertension medications emergency their case may remain with NYSoH for more than 12 months.

See here. See GIS 18 MA/001 - 2018 Medicaid Managed Care Transition for Enrollees Gaining Medicare, #4 for an explanation of this process. Note. During the hypertension medications emergency, those who have Medicaid through the NYSOH marketplace and enroll in Medicare should NOT have their cases transitioned to the LDSS. They should keep the same MAGI budgeting and automatically receive MIPP payments.

See GIS 20 MA/04 or this article on hypertension medications eligibility changes 4. Those with Special Budgeting after Losing SSI (DAC, Pickle, 1619b) Disabled Adult Child (DAC). Special budgeting is available to those who are 18+ and lose SSI because they begin receiving Disabled Adult Child (DAC) benefits (or receive an increase in the amount of their benefit). Consumer must have become disabled or blind before age 22 to receive the benefit. If the new DAC benefit amount was disregarded and the consumer would otherwise be eligible for SSI, they can keep Medicaid eligibility with NO SPEND DOWN.

See this article. Consumers may have income higher than MSP limits, but keep full Medicaid with no spend down. Therefore, they are eligible for payment of their Part B premiums. See page 96 of the Medicaid Reference Guide (Categorical Factors). If their income is lower than the MSP SLIMB threshold, they can be added to MSP.

If higher than the threshold, they can be reimbursed via MIPP. See also 95-ADM-11. Medical Assistance Eligibility for Disabled Adult Children, Section C (pg 8). Pickle &. 1619B.

5. When the Part B Premium Reduces Countable Income to Below the Medicaid Limit Since the Part B premium can be used as a deduction from gross income, it may reduce someone's countable income to below the Medicaid limit. The consumer should be paid the difference to bring her up to the Medicaid level ($904/month in 2021). They will only be reimbursed for the difference between their countable income and $904, not necessarily the full amount of the premium. See GIS 02-MA-019.

Reimbursement of Health Insurance Premiums MIPP and MSP are similar in that they both pay for the Medicare Part B premium, but there are some key differences. MIPP structures the payments as reimbursement -- beneficiaries must continue to pay their premium (via a monthly deduction from their Social Security check or quarterly billing, if they do not receive Social Security) and then are reimbursed via check. In contrast, MSP enrollees are not charged for their premium. Their Social Security check usually increases because the Part B premium is no longer withheld from their check. MIPP only provides reimbursement for Part B.

It does not have any of the other benefits MSPs can provide, such as. A consumer cannot have MIPP without also having Medicaid, whereas MSP enrollees can have MSP only. Of the above benefits, Medicaid also provides Part D Extra Help automatic eligibility. There is no application process for MIPP because consumers should be screened and enrolled automatically (00 OMM/ADM-7). Either the state or the LDSS is responsible for screening &.

Distributing MIPP payments, depending on where the Medicaid case is held and administered (14 /2014 LCM-02 Section V). If a consumer is eligible for MIPP and is not receiving it, they should contact whichever agency holds their case and request enrollment. Unfortunately, since there is no formal process for applying, it may require some advocacy. If Medicaid case is at New York State of Health they should call 1-855-355-5777. Consumers will likely have to ask for a supervisor in order to find someone familiar with MIPP.

If Medicaid case is with HRA in New York City, they should email mipp@hra.nyc.gov. If Medicaid case is with other local districts in NYS, call your local county DSS. Once enrolled, it make take a few months for payments to begin. Payments will be made in the form of checks from the Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC), the fiscal agent for the New York State Medicaid program. The check itself comes attached to a remittance notice from Medicaid Management Information Systems (MMIS).

Unfortunately, the notice is not consumer-friendly and may be confusing. See attached sample for what to look for.

Purchase lasix

The hypertension lasix has brought to public attention purchase lasix a variety of questions long debated in medical ethics, but now given both added urgency and wider publicity. Among these is triage, with its origins in deciding which individual lives are to be saved on a battlefield, but now also concerned with the allocation of scarce resources more generally. On the historical battlefield, decisions about whom to treat first – neither those who would survive without treatment, nor those who would not survive even with treatment, but those who needed treatment to survive – was facilitated by military discipline and the limited effectiveness of treatments available. In the allocation of scarce resources today, by contrast, such decisions are subject to intense public and political scrutiny, and the range of effective purchase lasix treatments available has immeasurably diminished the proportion of ‘those who would not survive even with treatment’.

If triage decisions are to be made, they now need to be justified in the arena of public opinion by moral arguments which are also politically persuasive.A number of different aspects of what is required for this endeavour are examined in the first five contributions to this issue of the Journal. In ‘Should age matter in hypertension medications triage?. A deliberative study’1, Kuylen and colleagues report on a deliberative study of public views in the UK, in which participants purchase lasix ‘generally accepted the need for triage but strongly rejected ’fair innings’ and ’life projects’ principles as justifications for age-based allocation,…preferring to maximise the number of lives rather than life years saved’. And concerned that in any resolution ‘utilitarian considerations of efficiency should be tempered with a concern for equality and vulnerability’.A similar concern to temper utilitarian considerations, in this case with an Aristotelian view of the common good as ‘the good life for each and every member of the community’ is expressed in ‘Public health decisions in the hypertension medications lasix require more than ‘follow the science’’ by de Campos-Rudinsky and Undurraga.2 Public health decisions, they argue, ‘always involve layers of complexity, coupled with uncertainty’.

€˜the implication of the incommensurability of basic human goods… is that when tensions between them arise (such as happened during this lasix, when preservation of health required the adaptation of how we experience work, education, leisure, family and friendships), the solution cannot be readily determined by a simple balancing test’. €˜Good decision-making in public health policy’ they purchase lasix conclude. €˜does depend on the availability of reliable data and rigorous analyses, but depends above all on sound ethical reasoning that ascribes value and normative judgement to empirical facts.’Triage decisions actually made during the lasix are the subject of ‘National health system cuts and triage decisions during the hypertension medications lasix in Italy and Spain. Ethical implications’ by Faggioni and colleagues.3 Analysing ‘the most important documents establishing the criteria for the treatment and exclusion of hypertension medications patients, especially in regard to the giving of respiratory support, in Italy and Spain’, they discover ‘a tension that stems from limited healthcare resources which are insufficient to save lives that, under normal conditions, could have been saved, or at least could have received the best possible treatment’.

In response, they ‘set forth a series of concrete ethical proposals with which to face the purchase lasix successive waves of hypertension medications , as well as other future lasixs’. These include the duty of health authorities ‘to plan for foreseeable ethical challenges during a health emergency’, and the duty of ‘public organisms at the national level, such as national committees on ethics…to prepare the protocols for care and treatment that would help physicians and healthcare workers to manage the predictable uncertainty and distress in healthcare emergencies’.Turning to a currently pressing international aspect of resource allocation, Jecker and colleagues, in ‘treatment ethics. An ethical framework for global distribution of hypertension medications treatments’4 marshal an impressive amount of empirical research and ethical theory to argue that ‘in order to accelerate development and fair, efficient treatment allocation…treatments should be distributed globally, with priority to frontline and essential workers worldwide’. €˜ethical values to guide treatment distribution’, they conclude, should ‘highlight values of helping the neediest, reducing health disparities, saving lives and keeping society functioning’.A further important resource purchase lasix often found to be all too scarce during the lasix was personal protective equipment (PPE).

In ‘Balancing health worker well-being and duty to care. An ethical approach to staff safety in hypertension medications and beyond’5, McDougall and colleagues ‘articulate some of the specific ethical challenges around PPE currently being faced by front-line clinicians, and develop an approach to staff safety that involves balancing duty to care and personal well-being’. This includes ‘a five-step structured…decision-making framework that facilitates ‘ethical reflection and/or decision-making that is systematic, specific and transparent’ and ‘guides the decision maker to characterise the degree of risk to staff, articulate feasible options for staff protection in that specific setting and identify the option purchase lasix that ensures any decrease in patient care is proportionate to the increase in staff well-being’.Because of the lasix and the fear of health services being overwhelmed by it, research on and treatment of other conditions, no less serious for the individual patient, have lacked resources which urgently require to be restored. Issues in medical ethics not directly related to hypertension medications equally call for renewed attention, not least because analysis of ethical questions raised by the lasix largely relies on intellectual tools forged in earlier debates on other subjects.

Three papers in this issue of the Journal return to subjects often discussed in medical ethics, but with fresh thinking on these, while a fourth examines a question which for many may be genuinely new.The role and functioning of research ethics committees (RECs) was one of the earliest concerns of twentieth century medical ethics and as these committees grew both in number and in the complexity of their deliberations, they have continued to receive ethical attention. In ‘Process of risk assessment by research purchase lasix ethics committees. Foundations, shortcomings and open questions’6 Rudra observes that ‘there is currently no uniform and solid theoretical approach to risk assessment by RECs’ and in response develops a detailed ‘concept of aggregate risk definition’ designed to ‘strengthen the coherence of REC decisions and therefore the trust between researchers and the institution of the REC as such’.‘Imperfect by design. The problematic ethics of surgical training’7 by Das, again addresses a familiar but difficult ethical question.

€˜How do we ethically validate the current training model for surgeons, in which trainees are often given operative duties that could likely be better purchase lasix handled by a staff physician?. €™ Admitting that the ‘deontological responsibilities of individual surgeons are incommensurable with the fundamentally utilitarian nature of the medical system’ the author argues that surgeons ‘as individuals must be willing to accept that they are knowingly foregoing optimal patient care on a small scale, and navigate the trade-offs which exist at the interface of two (possibly irreconcilable) philosophical system’.One of the most familiar of all subjects in medical ethics, that of consent, is discussed by Giordano and colleagues in ‘Gender dysphoria in adolescents. Can adolescents or parents give valid consent to puberty blockers?. €™8 The occasion for this discussion is a recent English judgement suggesting ‘that adolescents cannot give valid consent to treatment that temporarily suspends puberty’ - a claim which appears to contradict what hitherto was generally considered settled law on purchase lasix adolescent consent to medical treatment.

The authors, while not commenting on the specific case in question, carefully examine ‘four reasons why consent may be deemed invalid’ in cases of this kind. €˜the decision is too complex, the decision-makers are too emotionally involved, the decision-makers are on a ‘conveyor belt and ’the possibility of detransitioning’. They argue that ‘none of these stand up to scrutiny’ and conclude that ‘accepting purchase lasix these claims at face value could have serious negative implications, not just for gender diverse youth, but for many other minors and families and in a much broader range of healthcare settings.’While much has been written on whether patients can trust their doctors, whether doctors can trust their computers has been until recently a less familiar question in medical ethics. This month’s Feature Article, ‘Who is afraid of black box algorithms?.

On the epistemological and ethical basis of trust in medical AI’9 by Durán and Jongsma, together with four critical Commentaries, addresses this question with specific reference to the use in medicine of ‘black box’ algorithms, that is, algorithms whose ‘computational processes…do not follow well understood rules’ and are ‘methodologically opaque to humans’. In order to trust such algorithms, the authors argue, doctors do not purchase lasix necessarily need to understand their computational processes, provided their reliability is supported by ‘computational reliabilism’, evidence, that is, that the algorithm is ‘a reliable process…that yields, most of the time, trustworthy results’. On the other hand, even if the results are trustworthy, the authors warn, that is not sufficient to justify doctors in acting on them. €˜clinical findings and evidence need to be interpreted and contextualised, regardless of the methods used for analysis (ie, opaque or not), in order to determine how these should be acted on in clinical practice…even if recommendations provided by the medical AI system are trusted because the algorithm itself is reliable, these should not be followed blindly without further assessment.

Instead, we must keep humans in the loop of decision making by purchase lasix algorithms.’IntroductionThe first wave of the hypertension medications lasix put a large burden on many healthcare systems. Fears arose that demand for resources would exceed supply, necessitating triage in critical care, for example, when allocating intensive care unit (ICU) beds. The role of age in resource allocation was an especially salient issue given the proclivity of hypertension to cause excess mortality in older groups. Several hypertension medications triage guidelines included age as an explicit factor,1–4 and practices of both triage and ‘anticipatory triage’ likely limited access to hospital care for elderly patients, especially those in care homes.5–8 This raised ethical and societal questions about the purchase lasix role of age in triage decision making.9–11In medical ethics literature, different principles for resource allocation exist.

Following a scoping review, we identified four that have explicit implications for the use of age as a deciding factor in triage:(1) the ‘fair innings’ principle, (2) the ‘life projects’ principle, (3) the ‘egalitarian principle’ and (4) the ‘maximise life years’ principle. (1) The ‘fair innings’ principle prioritises younger over older people so that younger people also get the chance to reach later life stages.12 (2) The ‘life projects’ principle prioritises young to middle-aged people so that everyone gets the chance to complete their life projects (eg, raising children and making a career).13 (3) The egalitarian principle calls for equal treatment of all and does not permit discrimination on the basis of age, meaning we must take a ‘lottery’ or ‘first come, first served’ approach.14 15 (4) Finally, the ‘maximise life years’ principle, a utilitarian approach, permits indirect discrimination on the basis of age insofar as this maximises the amount of life years saved.16These principles have conflicting implications. Our study aimed to explore general public purchase lasix views on the role of age in triage decision making during the hypertension medications lasix. Specifically, we wanted to understand attitudes to the aforementioned four allocation principles, as well as on related factors such as quality of life and frailty.

We also sought to understand, and elicit, participants’ considered recommendations on triage, with a view to developing ethical guidelines that are sensitive to public thinking.MethodsWe held deliberative workshops with members of the general public following the general method of deliberative democracy,17–19 in collaboration with UK market research company Ipsos MORI, which has expertise in deliberative workshops. We requested them to recruit 25 participants from South East London, so as to inform clinical purchase lasix ethics forums in hospitals associated with King’s College London. Participants were guided through a deliberative process so they could arrive at an informed and considered opinion on topics that may have been new or unfamiliar to them. Four workshops, each lasting 2 hours, took place during 3 weeks across August and September 2020, in a particular social window between the first and second wave of hypertension medications.

This was an opportunity for participants to discuss the complex purchase lasix ethical questions on triage in a context in which its importance was pertinent. Three participants dropped out before the first session for personal reasons. Nineteen participants took part in all four sessions. The three remaining participants each took part in three out of purchase lasix four sessions.Deliberative democracy offers medical ethics a promising way to consult public preferences while ensuring these are adequately informed and considered.

The sessions met the three standards for deliberation set out by Blacksher et al.20 First, sessions included informative presentations to provide ‘balanced, factual information that improves participant’s knowledge of the issue’. Second, we ensured ‘the inclusion of diverse perspectives’ through strategic sampling. Participants reflected the demographics of the demographically diverse boroughs purchase lasix of Lambeth and Southwark (see table 1 for sample characteristics). We made particular effort to include participants over 60 years.

Third, participants were given ‘the opportunity to reflect on and discuss freely a wide spectrum of viewpoints and to challenge and test competing moral claims’. The sessions included plenary discussions and discussions in smaller breakout groups, which were facilitated by experienced purchase lasix qualitative research staff from Ipsos MORI. Facilitation was non-directive and neutral with respect to content but active in promotion of an engaged, inclusive process among participants.View this table:Table 1 Participant demographicsThe research team (GO, MNIK, ARK) observed sessions and held discussion with the facilitators between workshops. The sessions were transcribed by professional note takers, and transcriptions were thematically analysed in two stages.

First, general themes were identified in the raw data by Ipsos MORI and the research team purchase lasix and summarised in the report. In a second step, the research team analysed the raw data again with particular focus on the ethical reasoning underlying discussions.Ahead of the study, we worked with Ipsos MORI to develop a detailed but accessible discussion guide for the workshops and survey questions to be answered by participants after each session. We also developed information materials to present to participants. A presentation purchase lasix on how resource allocation and treatment escalation works in England’s National Health Service, an overview of relevant data on how hypertension medications affects the elderly, video presentations spelling out the four allocation principles, materials explaining the concepts of frailty and quality of life and case vignettes showing how triage dilemmas may arise.

These materials and further details of the methods are reported elsewhere.21During session 1, the information materials were presented to participants, and initial reactions to the four principles were briefly explored in breakout groups. During session 2, case study examples were discussed in breakout groups to examine the practical implications of the respective principles. During session 3, participants were introduced to the notions purchase lasix of frailty and quality of life and explored these in breakout groups through one further hypothetical triage dilemma. Participants also deliberated further on the four principles and were asked to spell out their concerns about them.

During session 4, participants were asked to formulate final recommendations and caveats in breakout groups. They also discussed how recommendations should be implemented and purchase lasix communicated to the public.Given lasix safety measures, the workshops were conducted online on Zoom. This was a relatively novel approach to deliberative democracy. Benefits of this approach were that participants felt more comfortable expressing opinions about sensitive subjects, carers or family members could more easily support older or vulnerable participants to contribute to the deliberations, and there was more time between sessions for reflection than with face-to-face sessions, which usually take place within 1 day.

Downsides were purchase lasix that some participants experienced minor technical difficulties.All participants gave informed consent before taking part.Findings‘Fair innings’ and ‘life projects’ principlesThe ‘fair innings’ and ‘life projects’ principle were strongly rejected from the outset and throughout the deliberative process. Participants found the ‘fair innings’ principle arbitrary and unnuanced, as well as unfair. They felt that age alone does not provide sufficient information about someone’s medical condition and that the lives of older people are important too. €˜We should get all equal treatment, young or old, we’re all purchase lasix the same’.

Some participants also mentioned the contributions of the elderly to society, stating that ‘older people have just as much to give to society as younger people do’. The ‘life projects’ principle was equally firmly rejected, on the basis that it was normalising, favouring existing societal norms that not everyone meets. €˜It’s very discriminatory purchase lasix and not right. There are late developers.

There are people who bloom later or earlier in life’. It was also emphasised that retirement was a time in which, after a life of work, people are finally purchase lasix free to start and pursue their life projects. €˜When you get older, that’s when you want to start projects. […] There are a lot of people almost having second lives doing all the things they couldn’t do previously’.

Dismissing this period, therefore, seemed counterintuitive.Egalitarian principleThe egalitarian principle was accepted, though a purchase lasix number of concerns about it were raised throughout the study. Initially, this principle was received as the most straightforward and fairest principle, but as discussion progressed, worries emerged about its practical application. First of all, participants rejected a randomised ‘lottery’ approach, preferring a ‘first come, first served’ version of this principle. €˜lottery doesn’t feel purchase lasix like a good system when it’s people lives.

It’s inappropriate’. But even the latter approach raised concerns. Participants were mostly worried about hidden inequalities, stating this approach would not redress, and even risk reinforcing, existing inequalities (eg, people purchase lasix with better access to the hospital may get there sooner). One participant said that ‘first come, first served isn’t egalitarian and you have the socio-economic challenges because, if you are in a particular class, you’re in a better position to be able to take care of yourself and get to the doctors first’.

There were further concerns that a ‘first come, first served’ approach would waste valuable resources, when patients with a worse prognosis happen to arrive earlier. Finally, some participants felt uneasy that, on this approach, resources would not necessarily go to purchase lasix those who need them most. €˜On the face of it, it looks good, but I think means that those that come in later who are in greater need haven’t got access’. A few participants remained in favour of an egalitarian approach, though all accepted that, if a patient’s prognosis is extremely poor, they should not be escalated for treatment.

€˜if you were following the egalitarian principle but you have someone in front purchase lasix of you who the evidence would suggest is highly unlikely to survive treatment and you’ve got someone who is highly likely to survive, as unfair as it may seem, it feels like it would be an important consideration […] I’m only thinking about extreme cases where you’ve got someone who is extremely frail and therefore extremely unlikely to survive’.‘Maximise life years’ principleWhen the ‘maximise life years’ principle was introduced, immediate concerns were raised about the accuracy of medical judgments about life expectancy. €˜Nobody knows how long anybody is going to live for. There are some assumptions, even if you’ve got two people in front of you, one who is 40 and one who is 60’. Furthermore, in discussing this principle, participants spontaneously distinguished survival chance from life expectancy in the deliberations and strongly favoured the former purchase lasix.

They supported maximising the number of lives saved, rather than the amount of life years saved. €˜There’s a logic in maximum number of lives you save irrespective of the number of life years they have’. The underlying reasoning purchase lasix seemed to be that every life is of equal value. A majority of participants agreed that ‘a life is a life’.It was thus widely felt that a patient’s immediate medical condition was a very important factor in triage, insofar as this informed their chances of survival.

In this context, participants recognised frailty as a key factor. Though it was not initially understood as a medical term, purchase lasix it was eventually accepted as a relevant prognostic variable for predicting survival chances.Some participants questioned the survival chance-based approach, though. For example, a small number of participants expressed concern about the disproportionate effects it could have on groups that may be more vulnerable to hypertension medications. €˜By virtue of prioritising survival of the fittest, it will discriminate and people are uncomfortable with this because it means older people will be less likely to be escalated, people in wheelchairs, people in BAME communities’.

Another more widespread worry was purchase lasix that this approach failed to allocate resources in accordance with need. These concerns led some participants to formulate a new, vulnerability-based allocation principle, which is discussed further below.Quality of lifeThe notion of quality of life was initially treated with suspicion, seen as inviting unconscious bias and too subjective. €˜I don’t know if professionals can really confirm how somebody’s well-being is’. Throughout the study, it was increasingly accepted, though mostly as a secondary factor when patients’ medical conditions are highly similar, in which case those with a higher quality of life purchase lasix would be prioritised.

Caveats were that it should only be applied in extreme cases and that quality of life assessments should, where possible, involve ‘input of the person, their family, carers and that kind of stuff’ to avoid biased assessments.However, one participant said those with a lower quality of life should be prioritised, so that their quality of life may be improved. Some also noted that quality of life may be strongly influenced by socioeconomic factors, indicating a danger of exacerbating existing inequalities. €˜I do purchase lasix worry with quality of life, the more money you have, the better quality of life you tend to have […] your health is defined by your class and how much money you have’.VulnerabilityThroughout the study, concerns were expressed about vulnerability, especially in reaction to the utilitarian approach. In these discussions, participants struggled to formulate an additional allocation principle.

This had two aspects, though these were not always clearly differentiated. One aspect concerned vulnerable groups (eg, age, disability or ethnic groups) who may be disproportionately affected by the lasix itself purchase lasix or the social response to it (eg, unconscious bias). One participant said. €˜we know it affects the elderly at higher rates than the youth.

[…] It makes the most sense to prioritise the elderly over the young, just on the basis of the percentages of purchase lasix old people vs young people dying. Young people are more likely to survive’. There was, however, some disagreement over whether positive action for these groups should indeed be taken to mitigate the vulnerability or whether this was itself a form of discrimination.The other aspect concerned individuals in need (eg, those presenting to hospital as sicker) and whether a humane principle was to prioritise those in greatest medical need. €˜The more help somebody needs, the more they should purchase lasix get’.

Some suggested to prioritise those least likely to survive. €˜I think the most vulnerable should be prioritised. […] If you think you purchase lasix can save them, then prioritise them’. Reasons given for such an approach were that ‘the true measure of any society is how it treats its most vulnerable members’.

But, again, it was accepted that if treatment was unlikely to succeed, patients should not be escalated. €˜you give the resources to the people that most need it, in my opinion, up until the point where the giving of resources is next to useless, where it’s ascertained that they will die anyway’.Other participants rejected this need-based approach altogether, out of a concern for efficiency purchase lasix. €˜Does that mean, if those people are most likely to die, you’re directing your resources at people who are weaker?. So resources could be going to a group who stand the least chance of surviving?.

That doesn’t feel like a great use of resources’.ImplementationDuring the final workshop, purchase lasix participants were asked how their recommendations should be implemented. We found strong support for discretion (applying recommendations as guidance rather than a mandatory policy), and participants felt groups of doctors, not individuals, should make decisions as this could reduce burden and bias. Thus, guidelines should not be binding but instead guide expert deliberation, and this deliberation is ideally executed by teams rather than individuals, so that different perspectives can be considered.DiscussionIn summary, we observed a strong rejection of the two explicitly age-based principles. A tolerance for an egalitarian ‘first come, first served’ principle, though purchase lasix with doubts about sufficiency.

Wide support for a newly formulated approach based on survival chances, with some consideration of frailty and quality of life. Concerns about group vulnerability and individual need. And a preference for discretion and deliberation in triage decision making.These findings raise important questions regarding existing guidelines and purchase lasix expert recommendations, when and where they do not align with them. Fallucchi et al22 have observed similar public intuitions, which digress from US triage guidelines, but conclude that the public requires more education.

We found, however, that these public moral intuitions persist even after a robust process of reflection and deliberation. We think purchase lasix this warrants serious consideration of public preferences.A first preference deserving serious consideration is the stark rejection of direct discrimination on the basis of age, as well as the use of randomised ‘lottery’ approaches, both of which have been observed in similar studies.22 23A second focal point is the preference for survival chance over life expectancy, which also has been observed elsewhere.19 22 Savulescu et al24 have criticised the UK’s NICE guidelines on resource allocation during hypertension medications25 for including considerations of survival chance but not life expectancy. The NICE guidelines reject the latter as it results in indirect discrimination on the basis of age. According to Savulescu et al, however, the guidelines already tolerate indirect discrimination since basing triage on survival chance will also disproportionally affect the elderly.

The authors purchase lasix thus assume both factors operate on the same logic. However, we suspect our participants may have highlighted an ethically relevant distinction between survival chance and life expectancy. In fact, there are at least two ways in which these factors may be different. First, considering purchase lasix life expectancy in triage seems closer to direct age-based discrimination.

While survival chance is closely linked to age specifically in the context of hypertension medications, life expectancy has a closer (indeed almost conceptual) link to age. To be older simply is to be closer to death. A similar distinction between survival chance and life expectancy has been made by Mello et al,26 who argue that purchase lasix only the latter results in disability-based discrimination. Second, a live saved and a life year saved seem to produce a different kind of value.

A life saved is a categorical outcome, whereas a life year saved is a scalar outcome. This conceptual difference seems ethically relevant because most participants considered any life saved of inherent value, regardless purchase lasix of its predicted length. It is ‘about saving as many people as possible, even if they have a shorter life’. On this logic, saving more of a life does not produce additional value.A third finding deserving of consideration is the concern about vulnerability.

The core values purchase lasix of equality and efficiency, and the question of how to balance both, are central to discussions about resource allocation. During our study, however, a third relevant principle spontaneously emerged from the discussions. Vulnerability. Though this purchase lasix notion was not unpacked in much detail during the deliberations, it alludes to values of antidiscrimination and protection, in line with emerging debates in the literature.27 28How can these public intuitions be incorporated into triage decisions?.

Participants generally accepted the need for triage but did not arrive at a unified recommendation of one principle. Indeed, in the final survey, recommendations included a mixture of principles and factors. However, a purchase lasix concern for three core principles and values emerged. As mentioned, deliberation resulted in the formulation of three broad, but distinguishable, allocation principles.

An egalitarian ‘first come, first served’ principle, a utilitarian principle (but based mainly on survival chance and frailty) and a ‘vulnerability’ principle. The underlying core purchase lasix values of each of these principles could be described as equality, efficiency and vulnerability, respectively. In other words, a ‘triad’ of ethical values emerged. While these remain very hard to fully respect at once, they captured a considered, multifaceted consensus.

All three principles were embedded in caveats and raised their own set purchase lasix of concerns. Notably, for each principle, these caveats and concerns can be linked back to the two other values of the triad:The egalitarian ‘equality’ principle raised concerns about efficiency and vulnerability. If treatment was likely futile, it was agreed that patients should forgo it (efficiency concern). Participants worried strongly about hidden inequalities (vulnerability concern).The ‘efficiency’ principle purchase lasix raised concerns about equality and vulnerability.

Most agreed that if there was a ‘close call’ between patients, an egalitarian approach should be adopted instead (equality concern). Some worried about groups more vulnerable to hypertension medications and about individuals with greater clinical need (vulnerability concerns).The ‘vulnerability’ principle raised concerns about equality and efficiency. Many participants resisted the notion of positive discrimination for vulnerable groups purchase lasix (equality concern). Many also worried that scarce resources would be ‘wasted’ on vulnerable individuals as they may not survive or take up more time in ICU (efficiency concerns).We are hopeful, therefore, that this ‘triad’ of ethical principles may be a useful structure to guide ethical deliberation as societies negotiate the conflicting ethical demands of triage.This links to our finding that participants favoured discretion and group deliberation in triage decisions.

In light of this, the triad may offer a useful framework, as it does not prescribe one single principle but rather a balancing exercise among three core values, ideally performed by a team of deliberators. In sum, rather than inviting moral paralysis, we hope this triad could guide fruitful case discussion for doctors, reduce moral distress and give them more confidence that the triage decisions they arrive at have public acceptability.Strengths and limitationsStrengthsWe achieved a purposeful sample, there was a high level of participant engagement, participants showed they could think through complex purchase lasix ethical topics, a triad consensus emerged from a very diverse South-East London group, indicating a degree of robustness and there was the ecological validity of doing this study in the social window in between two hypertension medications waves.LimitationsThe South-East London sample may not generalise to other areas, findings may not generalise to other triage contexts (eg, lasixs effecting children) and some elements, for example, vulnerability, remained underexplored, indicating a need for further research.ConclusionTo ensure the legitimacy of triage guidelines, which affect the public, it is important to engage the public’s moral intuitions, as they do not always align with expert recommendations. Guiding the public through a process of deliberation ensures that public intuitions do not stem from ignorance or misunderstanding but rather express genuine and considered preferences. We found that (widespread) utilitarian considerations of efficiency should be tempered with a concern for equality and vulnerability.Data availability statementNo data are available.Ethics statementsPatient consent for publicationNot required.Ethics approvalThe study was approved under the Ipsos MORI research ethics committee.AcknowledgmentsWe are grateful to Suzanne Hall, Chloe Juliette, Paul Carroll and Tom Cooper at Ipsos MORI, and to Bobby Duffy, Benedict Wilkinson, Alexandra Pollitt and Lucy Strang at the Policy Institute for their input.

The hypertension lasix has brought to public attention a variety of questions long debated in medical ethics, but now given both added lasix price urgency and wider publicity. Among these is triage, with its origins in deciding which individual lives are to be saved on a battlefield, but now also concerned with the allocation of scarce resources more generally. On the historical battlefield, decisions about whom to treat first – neither those who would survive without treatment, nor those who would not survive even with treatment, but those who needed treatment to survive – was facilitated by military discipline and the limited effectiveness of treatments available. In the allocation of scarce resources today, by contrast, such decisions are subject to intense public and political scrutiny, and lasix price the range of effective treatments available has immeasurably diminished the proportion of ‘those who would not survive even with treatment’.

If triage decisions are to be made, they now need to be justified in the arena of public opinion by moral arguments which are also politically persuasive.A number of different aspects of what is required for this endeavour are examined in the first five contributions to this issue of the Journal. In ‘Should age matter in hypertension medications triage?. A deliberative study’1, Kuylen and colleagues report on a deliberative study of public views in the UK, in which participants ‘generally accepted the need for triage lasix price but strongly rejected ’fair innings’ and ’life projects’ principles as justifications for age-based allocation,…preferring to maximise the number of lives rather than life years saved’. And concerned that in any resolution ‘utilitarian considerations of efficiency should be tempered with a concern for equality and vulnerability’.A similar concern to temper utilitarian considerations, in this case with an Aristotelian view of the common good as ‘the good life for each and every member of the community’ is expressed in ‘Public health decisions in the hypertension medications lasix require more than ‘follow the science’’ by de Campos-Rudinsky and Undurraga.2 Public health decisions, they argue, ‘always involve layers of complexity, coupled with uncertainty’.

€˜the implication of the incommensurability of basic human goods… is that when tensions between them arise (such as happened during this lasix, when preservation of health required the adaptation of how we experience work, education, leisure, family and friendships), the solution cannot be readily determined by a simple balancing test’. €˜Good decision-making in lasix price public health policy’ they conclude. €˜does depend on the availability of reliable data and rigorous analyses, but depends above all on sound ethical reasoning that ascribes value and normative judgement to empirical facts.’Triage decisions actually made during the lasix are the subject of ‘National health system cuts and triage decisions during the hypertension medications lasix in Italy and Spain. Ethical implications’ by Faggioni and colleagues.3 Analysing ‘the most important documents establishing the criteria for the treatment and exclusion of hypertension medications patients, especially in regard to the giving of respiratory support, in Italy and Spain’, they discover ‘a tension that stems from limited healthcare resources which are insufficient to save lives that, under normal conditions, could have been saved, or at least could have received the best possible treatment’.

In response, they ‘set forth a series of concrete ethical proposals with lasix price which to face the successive waves of hypertension medications , as well as other future lasixs’. These include the duty of health authorities ‘to plan for foreseeable ethical challenges during a health emergency’, and the duty of ‘public organisms at the national level, such as national committees on ethics…to prepare the protocols for care and treatment that would help physicians and healthcare workers to manage the predictable uncertainty and distress in healthcare emergencies’.Turning to a currently pressing international aspect of resource allocation, Jecker and colleagues, in ‘treatment ethics. An ethical framework for global distribution of hypertension medications treatments’4 marshal an impressive amount of empirical research and ethical theory to argue that ‘in order to accelerate development and fair, efficient treatment allocation…treatments should be distributed globally, with priority to frontline and essential workers worldwide’. €˜ethical values lasix price to guide treatment distribution’, they conclude, should ‘highlight values of helping the neediest, reducing health disparities, saving lives and keeping society functioning’.A further important resource often found to be all too scarce during the lasix was personal protective equipment (PPE).

In ‘Balancing health worker well-being and duty to care. An ethical approach to staff safety in hypertension medications and beyond’5, McDougall and colleagues ‘articulate some of the specific ethical challenges around PPE currently being faced by front-line clinicians, and develop an approach to staff safety that involves balancing duty to care and personal well-being’. This includes ‘a five-step structured…decision-making framework that facilitates ‘ethical reflection and/or decision-making that is systematic, specific and transparent’ and ‘guides the decision maker to characterise the degree of risk to staff, articulate feasible options for staff protection in that specific setting and identify the option that ensures any decrease in patient care is proportionate to the increase in staff well-being’.Because of the lasix and the fear of health services being overwhelmed by it, research on and treatment of other conditions, no less serious for the individual patient, lasix price have lacked resources which urgently require to be restored. Issues in medical ethics not directly related to hypertension medications equally call for renewed attention, not least because analysis of ethical questions raised by the lasix largely relies on intellectual tools forged in earlier debates on other subjects.

Three papers in this issue of the Journal return to subjects often discussed in medical ethics, but with fresh thinking on these, while a fourth examines a question which for many may be genuinely new.The role and functioning of research ethics committees (RECs) was one of the earliest concerns of twentieth century medical ethics and as these committees grew both in number and in the complexity of their deliberations, they have continued to receive ethical attention. In ‘Process of risk assessment by research ethics committees lasix price. Foundations, shortcomings and open questions’6 Rudra observes that ‘there is currently no uniform and solid theoretical approach to risk assessment by RECs’ and in response develops a detailed ‘concept of aggregate risk definition’ designed to ‘strengthen the coherence of REC decisions and therefore the trust between researchers and the institution of the REC as such’.‘Imperfect by design. The problematic ethics of surgical training’7 by Das, again addresses a familiar but difficult ethical question.

€˜How do we ethically validate the current training model for surgeons, in which trainees are often given operative lasix price duties that could likely be better handled by a staff physician?. €™ Admitting that the ‘deontological responsibilities of individual surgeons are incommensurable with the fundamentally utilitarian nature of the medical system’ the author argues that surgeons ‘as individuals must be willing to accept that they are knowingly foregoing optimal patient care on a small scale, and navigate the trade-offs which exist at the interface of two (possibly irreconcilable) philosophical system’.One of the most familiar of all subjects in medical ethics, that of consent, is discussed by Giordano and colleagues in ‘Gender dysphoria in adolescents. Can adolescents or parents give valid consent to puberty blockers?. €™8 The occasion for this discussion is a recent English judgement suggesting ‘that adolescents cannot give lasix price valid consent to treatment that temporarily suspends puberty’ - a claim which appears to contradict what hitherto was generally considered settled law on adolescent consent to medical treatment.

The authors, while not commenting on the specific case in question, carefully examine ‘four reasons why consent may be deemed invalid’ in cases of this kind. €˜the decision is too complex, the decision-makers are too emotionally involved, the decision-makers are on a ‘conveyor belt and ’the possibility of detransitioning’. They argue that ‘none of these stand up to scrutiny’ and conclude that ‘accepting these claims at face lasix price value could have serious negative implications, not just for gender diverse youth, but for many other minors and families and in a much broader range of healthcare settings.’While much has been written on whether patients can trust their doctors, whether doctors can trust their computers has been until recently a less familiar question in medical ethics. This month’s Feature Article, ‘Who is afraid of black box algorithms?.

On the epistemological and ethical basis of trust in medical AI’9 by Durán and Jongsma, together with four critical Commentaries, addresses this question with specific reference to the use in medicine of ‘black box’ algorithms, that is, algorithms whose ‘computational processes…do not follow well understood rules’ and are ‘methodologically opaque to humans’. In order to trust such algorithms, the authors argue, doctors do not necessarily need to understand their computational processes, provided their reliability is lasix price supported by ‘computational reliabilism’, evidence, that is, that the algorithm is ‘a reliable process…that yields, most of the time, trustworthy results’. On the other hand, even if the results are trustworthy, the authors warn, that is not sufficient to justify doctors in acting on them. €˜clinical findings and evidence need to be interpreted and contextualised, regardless of the methods used for analysis (ie, opaque or not), in order to determine how these should be acted on in clinical practice…even if recommendations provided by the medical AI system are trusted because the algorithm itself is reliable, these should not be followed blindly without further assessment.

Instead, we must keep humans in the loop of decision making by algorithms.’IntroductionThe first wave of the hypertension medications lasix put a lasix price large burden on many healthcare systems. Fears arose that demand for resources would exceed supply, necessitating triage in critical care, for example, when allocating intensive care unit (ICU) beds. The role of age in resource allocation was an especially salient issue given the proclivity of hypertension to cause excess mortality in older groups. Several hypertension medications triage guidelines included age as an explicit lasix price factor,1–4 and practices of both triage and ‘anticipatory triage’ likely limited access to hospital care for elderly patients, especially those in care homes.5–8 This raised ethical and societal questions about the role of age in triage decision making.9–11In medical ethics literature, different principles for resource allocation exist.

Following a scoping review, we identified four that have explicit implications for the use of age as a deciding factor in triage:(1) the ‘fair innings’ principle, (2) the ‘life projects’ principle, (3) the ‘egalitarian principle’ and (4) the ‘maximise life years’ principle. (1) The ‘fair innings’ principle prioritises younger over older people so that younger people also get the chance to reach later life stages.12 (2) The ‘life projects’ principle prioritises young to middle-aged people so that everyone gets the chance to complete their life projects (eg, raising children and making a career).13 (3) The egalitarian principle calls for equal treatment of all and does not permit discrimination on the basis of age, meaning we must take a ‘lottery’ or ‘first come, first served’ approach.14 15 (4) Finally, the ‘maximise life years’ principle, a utilitarian approach, permits indirect discrimination on the basis of age insofar as this maximises the amount of life years saved.16These principles have conflicting implications. Our study aimed to explore general public views on the role of age in triage lasix price decision making during the hypertension medications lasix. Specifically, we wanted to understand attitudes to the aforementioned four allocation principles, as well as on related factors such as quality of life and frailty.

We also sought to understand, and elicit, participants’ considered recommendations on triage, with a view to developing ethical guidelines that are sensitive to public thinking.MethodsWe held deliberative workshops with members of the general public following the general method of deliberative democracy,17–19 in collaboration with UK market research company Ipsos MORI, which has expertise in deliberative workshops. We requested them to recruit 25 participants from South East London, so as to inform lasix price clinical ethics forums in hospitals associated with King’s College London. Participants were guided through a deliberative process so they could arrive at an informed and considered opinion on topics that may have been new or unfamiliar to them. Four workshops, each lasting 2 hours, took place during 3 weeks across August and September 2020, in a particular social window between the first and second wave of hypertension medications.

This was lasix price an opportunity for participants to discuss the complex ethical questions on triage in a context in which its importance was pertinent. Three participants dropped out before the first session for personal reasons. Nineteen participants took part in all four sessions. The three remaining participants each took part in three out of four sessions.Deliberative democracy offers medical lasix price ethics a promising way to consult public preferences while ensuring these are adequately informed and considered.

The sessions met the three standards for deliberation set out by Blacksher et al.20 First, sessions included informative presentations to provide ‘balanced, factual information that improves participant’s knowledge of the issue’. Second, we ensured ‘the inclusion of diverse perspectives’ through strategic sampling. Participants reflected lasix price the demographics of the demographically diverse boroughs of Lambeth and Southwark (see table 1 for sample characteristics). We made particular effort to include participants over 60 years.

Third, participants were given ‘the opportunity to reflect on and discuss freely a wide spectrum of viewpoints and to challenge and test competing moral claims’. The sessions included plenary discussions and discussions in smaller breakout groups, which were lasix price facilitated by experienced qualitative research staff from Ipsos MORI. Facilitation was non-directive and neutral with respect to content but active in promotion of an engaged, inclusive process among participants.View this table:Table 1 Participant demographicsThe research team (GO, MNIK, ARK) observed sessions and held discussion with the facilitators between workshops. The sessions were transcribed by professional note takers, and transcriptions were thematically analysed in two stages.

First, general themes were identified in the lasix price raw data by Ipsos MORI and the research team and summarised in the report. In a second step, the research team analysed the raw data again with particular focus on the ethical reasoning underlying discussions.Ahead of the study, we worked with Ipsos MORI to develop a detailed but accessible discussion guide for the workshops and survey questions to be answered by participants after each session. We also developed information materials to present to participants. A presentation on how resource allocation and treatment escalation works in England’s National Health Service, an overview of relevant data on how hypertension medications affects the elderly, video presentations spelling out the lasix price four allocation principles, materials explaining the concepts of frailty and quality of life and case vignettes showing how triage dilemmas may arise.

These materials and further details of the methods are reported elsewhere.21During session 1, the information materials were presented to participants, and initial reactions to the four principles were briefly explored in breakout groups. During session 2, case study examples were discussed in breakout groups to examine the practical implications of the respective principles. During session 3, participants lasix price were introduced to the notions of frailty and quality of life and explored these in breakout groups through one further hypothetical triage dilemma. Participants also deliberated further on the four principles and were asked to spell out their concerns about them.

During session 4, participants were asked to formulate final recommendations and caveats in breakout groups. They also discussed how recommendations should be implemented and communicated to the public.Given lasix safety measures, the workshops were lasix price conducted online on Zoom. This was a relatively novel approach to deliberative democracy. Benefits of this approach were that participants felt more comfortable expressing opinions about sensitive subjects, carers or family members could more easily support older or vulnerable participants to contribute to the deliberations, and there was more time between sessions for reflection than with face-to-face sessions, which usually take place within 1 day.

Downsides were that some participants experienced minor technical difficulties.All participants gave informed consent before taking part.Findings‘Fair innings’ and ‘life projects’ principlesThe ‘fair innings’ and ‘life projects’ principle were strongly rejected from the outset lasix price and throughout the deliberative process. Participants found the ‘fair innings’ principle arbitrary and unnuanced, as well as unfair. They felt that age alone does not provide sufficient information about someone’s medical condition and that the lives of older people are important too. €˜We should get all equal treatment, young or old, we’re all lasix price the same’.

Some participants also mentioned the contributions of the elderly to society, stating that ‘older people have just as much to give to society as younger people do’. The ‘life projects’ principle was equally firmly rejected, on the basis that it was normalising, favouring existing societal norms that not everyone meets. €˜It’s very lasix price discriminatory and not right. There are late developers.

There are people who bloom later or earlier in life’. It was also emphasised that retirement was a time lasix price in which, after a life of work, people are finally free to start and pursue their life projects. €˜When you get older, that’s when you want to start projects. […] There are a lot of people almost having second lives doing all the things they couldn’t do previously’.

Dismissing this period, therefore, seemed counterintuitive.Egalitarian principleThe egalitarian principle was accepted, though a number of lasix price concerns about it were raised throughout the study. Initially, this principle was received as the most straightforward and fairest principle, but as discussion progressed, worries emerged about its practical application. First of all, participants rejected a randomised ‘lottery’ approach, preferring a ‘first come, first served’ version of this principle. €˜lottery doesn’t feel like a good system when lasix price it’s people lives.

It’s inappropriate’. But even the latter approach raised concerns. Participants were mostly worried about hidden inequalities, stating this approach would lasix price not redress, and even risk reinforcing, existing inequalities (eg, people with better access to the hospital may get there sooner). One participant said that ‘first come, first served isn’t egalitarian and you have the socio-economic challenges because, if you are in a particular class, you’re in a better position to be able to take care of yourself and get to the doctors first’.

There were further concerns that a ‘first come, first served’ approach would waste valuable resources, when patients with a worse prognosis happen to arrive earlier. Finally, some participants felt uneasy that, lasix price on this approach, resources would not necessarily go to those who need them most. €˜On the face of it, it looks good, but I think means that those that come in later who are in greater need haven’t got access’. A few participants remained in favour of an egalitarian approach, though all accepted that, if a patient’s prognosis is extremely poor, they should not be escalated for treatment.

€˜if you were following the egalitarian principle but you have someone in front of you who the evidence would suggest is highly unlikely to survive treatment and you’ve got someone who is highly likely to survive, lasix price as unfair as it may seem, it feels like it would be an important consideration […] I’m only thinking about extreme cases where you’ve got someone who is extremely frail and therefore extremely unlikely to survive’.‘Maximise life years’ principleWhen the ‘maximise life years’ principle was introduced, immediate concerns were raised about the accuracy of medical judgments about life expectancy. €˜Nobody knows how long anybody is going to live for. There are some assumptions, even if you’ve got two people in front of you, one who is 40 and one who is 60’. Furthermore, in discussing this principle, participants lasix price spontaneously distinguished survival chance from life expectancy in the deliberations and strongly favoured the former.

They supported maximising the number of lives saved, rather than the amount of life years saved. €˜There’s a logic in maximum number of lives you save irrespective of the number of life years they have’. The underlying reasoning seemed to be lasix price that every life is of equal value. A majority of participants agreed that ‘a life is a life’.It was thus widely felt that a patient’s immediate medical condition was a very important factor in triage, insofar as this informed their chances of survival.

In this context, participants recognised frailty as a key factor. Though it was not initially understood lasix price as a medical term, it was eventually accepted as a relevant prognostic variable for predicting survival chances.Some participants questioned the survival chance-based approach, though. For example, a small number of participants expressed concern about the disproportionate effects it could have on groups that may be more vulnerable to hypertension medications. €˜By virtue of prioritising survival of the fittest, it will discriminate and people are uncomfortable with this because it means older people will be less likely to be escalated, people in wheelchairs, people in BAME communities’.

Another more widespread lasix price worry was that this approach failed to allocate resources in accordance with need. These concerns led some participants to formulate a new, vulnerability-based allocation principle, which is discussed further below.Quality of lifeThe notion of quality of life was initially treated with suspicion, seen as inviting unconscious bias and too subjective. €˜I don’t know if professionals can really confirm how somebody’s well-being is’. Throughout the study, it was increasingly accepted, though mostly as a secondary factor when patients’ medical conditions are highly similar, in which case those with a higher quality of life would be prioritised lasix price.

Caveats were that it should only be applied in extreme cases and that quality of life assessments should, where possible, involve ‘input of the person, their family, carers and that kind of stuff’ to avoid biased assessments.However, one participant said those with a lower quality of life should be prioritised, so that their quality of life may be improved. Some also noted that quality of life may be strongly influenced by socioeconomic factors, indicating a danger of exacerbating existing inequalities. €˜I do worry with quality of life, the more money you have, lasix price the better quality of life you tend to have […] your health is defined by your class and how much money you have’.VulnerabilityThroughout the study, concerns were expressed about vulnerability, especially in reaction to the utilitarian approach. In these discussions, participants struggled to formulate an additional allocation principle.

This had two aspects, though these were not always clearly differentiated. One aspect concerned vulnerable groups (eg, age, disability or ethnic lasix price groups) who may be disproportionately affected by the lasix itself or the social response to it (eg, unconscious bias). One participant said. €˜we know it affects the elderly at higher rates than the youth.

[…] It makes the most sense to prioritise the lasix price elderly over the young, just on the basis of the percentages of old people vs young people dying. Young people are more likely to survive’. There was, however, some disagreement over whether positive action for these groups should indeed be taken to mitigate the vulnerability or whether this was itself a form of discrimination.The other aspect concerned individuals in need (eg, those presenting to hospital as sicker) and whether a humane principle was to prioritise those in greatest medical need. €˜The more help somebody needs, lasix price the more they should get’.

Some suggested to prioritise those least likely to survive. €˜I think the most vulnerable should be prioritised. […] If you think you can save them, then prioritise lasix price them’. Reasons given for such an approach were that ‘the true measure of any society is how it treats its most vulnerable members’.

But, again, it was accepted that if treatment was unlikely to succeed, patients should not be escalated. €˜you give the resources to lasix price the people that most need it, in my opinion, up until the point where the giving of resources is next to useless, where it’s ascertained that they will die anyway’.Other participants rejected this need-based approach altogether, out of a concern for efficiency. €˜Does that mean, if those people are most likely to die, you’re directing your resources at people who are weaker?. So resources could be going to a group who stand the least chance of surviving?.

That doesn’t feel like a great use of resources’.ImplementationDuring the final workshop, participants lasix price were asked how their recommendations should be implemented. We found strong support for discretion (applying recommendations as guidance rather than a mandatory policy), and participants felt groups of doctors, not individuals, should make decisions as this could reduce burden and bias. Thus, guidelines should not be binding but instead guide expert deliberation, and this deliberation is ideally executed by teams rather than individuals, so that different perspectives can be considered.DiscussionIn summary, we observed a strong rejection of the two explicitly age-based principles. A tolerance for an egalitarian ‘first come, first served’ lasix price principle, though with doubts about sufficiency.

Wide support for a newly formulated approach based on survival chances, with some consideration of frailty and quality of life. Concerns about group vulnerability and individual need. And a preference for discretion and deliberation in triage decision making.These findings raise important questions regarding existing guidelines and expert lasix price recommendations, when and where they do not align with them. Fallucchi et al22 have observed similar public intuitions, which digress from US triage guidelines, but conclude that the public requires more education.

We found, however, that these public moral intuitions persist even after a robust process of reflection and deliberation. We think this warrants serious consideration of public preferences.A first preference deserving serious consideration is the stark rejection of direct discrimination on the basis of age, as well as the use of randomised ‘lottery’ approaches, both of which have been observed in similar studies.22 23A second focal point is the preference for survival chance over life expectancy, which also lasix price has been observed elsewhere.19 22 Savulescu et al24 have criticised the UK’s NICE guidelines on resource allocation during hypertension medications25 for including considerations of survival chance but not life expectancy. The NICE guidelines reject the latter as it results in indirect discrimination on the basis of age. According to Savulescu et al, however, the guidelines already tolerate indirect discrimination since basing triage on survival chance will also disproportionally affect the elderly.

The authors lasix price thus assume both factors operate on the same logic. However, we suspect our participants may have highlighted an ethically relevant distinction between survival chance and life expectancy. In fact, there are at least two ways in which these factors may be different. First, considering life expectancy in triage seems closer to lasix price direct age-based discrimination.

While survival chance is closely linked to age specifically in the context of hypertension medications, life expectancy has a closer (indeed almost conceptual) link to age. To be older simply is to be closer to death. A similar distinction between survival chance lasix price and life expectancy has been made by Mello et al,26 who argue that only the latter results in disability-based discrimination. Second, a live saved and a life year saved seem to produce a different kind of value.

A life saved is a categorical outcome, whereas a life year saved is a scalar outcome. This conceptual difference seems ethically relevant because most lasix price participants considered any life saved of inherent value, regardless of its predicted length. It is ‘about saving as many people as possible, even if they have a shorter life’. On this logic, saving more of a life does not produce additional value.A third finding deserving of consideration is the concern about vulnerability.

The core values of equality and efficiency, lasix price and the question of how to balance both, are central to discussions about resource allocation. During our study, however, a third relevant principle spontaneously emerged from the discussions. Vulnerability. Though this notion was not unpacked in much detail during the deliberations, it alludes lasix price to values of antidiscrimination and protection, in line with emerging debates in the literature.27 28How can these public intuitions be incorporated into triage decisions?.

Participants generally accepted the need for triage but did not arrive at a unified recommendation of one principle. Indeed, in the final survey, recommendations included a mixture of principles and factors. However, a lasix price concern for three core principles and values emerged. As mentioned, deliberation resulted in the formulation of three broad, but distinguishable, allocation principles.

An egalitarian ‘first come, first served’ principle, a utilitarian principle (but based mainly on survival chance and frailty) and a ‘vulnerability’ principle. The underlying core values lasix price of each of these principles could be described as equality, efficiency and vulnerability, respectively. In other words, a ‘triad’ of ethical values emerged. While these remain very hard to fully respect at once, they captured a considered, multifaceted consensus.

All three principles lasix price were embedded in caveats and raised their own set of concerns. Notably, for each principle, these caveats and concerns can be linked back to the two other values of the triad:The egalitarian ‘equality’ principle raised concerns about efficiency and vulnerability. If treatment was likely futile, it was agreed that patients should forgo it (efficiency concern). Participants worried strongly about hidden inequalities (vulnerability concern).The lasix price ‘efficiency’ principle raised concerns about equality and vulnerability.

Most agreed that if there was a ‘close call’ between patients, an egalitarian approach should be adopted instead (equality concern). Some worried about groups more vulnerable to hypertension medications and about individuals with greater clinical need (vulnerability concerns).The ‘vulnerability’ principle raised concerns about equality and efficiency. Many participants resisted the notion of positive lasix price discrimination for vulnerable groups (equality concern). Many also worried that scarce resources would be ‘wasted’ on vulnerable individuals as they may not survive or take up more time in ICU (efficiency concerns).We are hopeful, therefore, that this ‘triad’ of ethical principles may be a useful structure to guide ethical deliberation as societies negotiate the conflicting ethical demands of triage.This links to our finding that participants favoured discretion and group deliberation in triage decisions.

In light of this, the triad may offer a useful framework, as it does not prescribe one single principle but rather a balancing exercise among three core values, ideally performed by a team of deliberators. In sum, rather than inviting moral paralysis, we hope this triad could guide fruitful case discussion for doctors, reduce moral distress and give them more confidence that the triage decisions they arrive at have public acceptability.Strengths and limitationsStrengthsWe achieved a purposeful sample, there was a high level of participant engagement, participants showed they could think through complex ethical topics, a triad consensus emerged from a very diverse South-East London group, indicating a degree of robustness and there was the ecological validity of doing this study in the social window in between two hypertension medications waves.LimitationsThe South-East London sample may not generalise to other areas, findings may not generalise to other triage contexts (eg, lasixs effecting children) and some elements, for example, vulnerability, remained underexplored, indicating a lasix price need for further research.ConclusionTo ensure the legitimacy of triage guidelines, which affect the public, it is important to engage the public’s moral intuitions, as they do not always align with expert recommendations. Guiding the public through a process of deliberation ensures that public intuitions do not stem from ignorance or misunderstanding but rather express genuine and considered preferences. We found that (widespread) utilitarian considerations of efficiency should be tempered with a concern for equality and vulnerability.Data availability statementNo data are available.Ethics statementsPatient consent for publicationNot required.Ethics approvalThe study was approved under the Ipsos MORI research ethics committee.AcknowledgmentsWe are grateful to Suzanne Hall, Chloe Juliette, Paul Carroll and Tom Cooper at Ipsos MORI, and to Bobby Duffy, Benedict Wilkinson, Alexandra Pollitt and Lucy Strang at the Policy Institute for their input.

;